Assessing the Quality and Transparency of Financial Audit Reporting in the Context of Gender Differences – Evidence from Companies Listed on the Regulated Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2025-0003Keywords:
audit quality, audit report, gender differences, key audit matters (KAM), audit opinion.Abstract
Analyzing the impact of gender differences in financial auditing has become an important research issue with the aim of promoting equity and fairness within profession, on the one hand, and to determine the impact that gender disparities may have on quality, diversity and innovation in financial auditing, on the other hand. Quality and transparency are important elements that characterize audit reporting as they contribute to providing reliable and relevant information to stakeholders. Including the impact of gender differences in this equation helps to highlight how quality is perceived, as well as to identify associated risks, evaluate the audit process and communicate audit results. The aim of this study is to investigate how the gender of the signatory of the audit report influences the level of quality and transparency of the issued report, the sample including the firms listed on the Regulated Market of the Bucharest Stock Exchange (BSE) that are subject to the audit of annual financial statements for period 2016-2022. Regression and multiple correspondence factor analysis models are applied on 469 observations. The results of this study show that the quality and transparency of reporting in financial auditing are influenced by gender differences, with mixed teams of auditors leading to higher quality of reporting. Obtaining these results underscores the importance of investigating and raising awareness of the impact of gender disparities in financial auditing and the need to address this issue with utmost care and objectivity in efforts to promote a fairer and more efficient audit profession.
References
Aghaie Ghehie, A., Yazdani, S., & Khanmohammadi, M. (2022). Audit Quality Measurement Model. International Journal of Finance Managerial Accounting, 7(25), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.30495/ijfma.2022.16830
Al-Dhamari, R. A. A., & Chandren, S. (2018). Audit Partners Gender, Auditor Quality and Clients Value Relevance. Global Business Review, 19(4), 952-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0972150917697747
Alsmady, A. A. (2022). Quality of financial reporting, external audit, earnings power and companies performance: The case of Gulf Corporate Council Countries. Research in Globalization, 5, 100093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2022.100093
Alsughayer, S. A. (2021). Impact of Auditor Competence, Integrity, and Ethics on Audit Quality in Saudi Arabia. Open Journal of Accounting, 10(4), 125-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojacct.2021.104011
Baker, C. R., Bédard, J., & Prat Dit Hauret, C. (2014). The Regulation of Statutory Auditing: An Institutional Theory Approach. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(5), 371-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2013-0931
Bédard, J., Brousseau, C., & Sirois, L. (2024). Engagement Partner Identification Format and Audit Quality. International Journal of Auditing, 28(1), 97-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12315
Cameran, M., Ditillo, A., & Pettinicchio, A. (2018). Audit Team Attributes Matter: How Diversity Affects Audit Quality. European Accounting Review, 27(4), 595-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1307131
Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit Partner Tenure and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.653
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
Charron, J.-O. (2004). L’idéologie de la Transparence dans L’audit: Une Approche de sa Dimension Médiatique. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 10(3), 105-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/cca.103.0105
Chen, J., & James, M. (2021). Transparency: Definition, How It Works in Finance, and Example. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/transparency.asp
Chen, Q., Jiang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Does Audit Transparency Improve Audit Quality and Investment Efficiency? SSRN(December), 1-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2538076
Chen, Q., Jiang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The Effects of Audit Quality Disclosure on Audit Effort and Investment Efficiency. The Accounting Review, 94(4), 189-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-52286
Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2001). A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13(1), 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111
Dang, C., Li, Z. F., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring Firm Size in Empirical Corporate Finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86(1), 159-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521-1552. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
Garcia-Blandon, J., Argilés-Bosch, J. M., & Ravenda, D. (2019). Is There a Gender Effect on The Quality of Audit Services? Journal of Business Research, 96(C), 238-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.024
Grosu, M., Mihalciuc, C. C., & Apostol, C. (2023). Analysis of Reporting Transparency in Financial Audit through KAM and Gender Differences. European Financial Resilience and Regulation. 2023. Retrieved from https://eufire.uaic.ro/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/EUFIRE-2023.pdf
Grosu, M., Robu, I. B., Istrate, C., & Istrate, M. (2022). Influence of Gender Differences on the Quality of Financial Audit Engagements for Listed Companies (Vol. 20). Bucuresti: Camera Auditorilor Financiari din România. http://dx.doi.org/10.20869/AUDITF/2022/166/010
Hao, J., Pham, V., & Guo, M. (2022). The Gender Effects of Audit Partners on Audit Outcomes: Evidence of Rule 3211 Adoption. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(2), 275-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04732-w
Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2016). Do (Fe)Male Auditors Impair Audit Quality? Evidence from Going-Concern Opinions. European Accounting Review, 25(1), 7-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.921445
Herawati, A., Sutrisno, T., & Purwanti, L. (2023). Determinants of Auditor’s Ability to Detect Fraud With Professional Skepticism as Moderation at the Inspectorate General of The Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 6(2), 123-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v6n2.2132
Herghiligiu, I. V., Robu, I. B., Istrate, M., Grosu, M., Mihalciuc, C. C., & Vilcu, A. (2023). Sustainable Corporate Performance Based on Audit Report Influence: An Empirical Approach through Financial Transparency and Gender Equality Dimensions. Sustainability, 15(18), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su151814033
IAASB. (2015). Auditor Reporting – Key Audit Matters. Supporting International Standards. Retrieved from https://www.iaasb.org/publications/auditor-reporting-key-audit-matters-3
IAASB, & IFAC. (2022). Manualul de Reglementări Internaționale de Control al Calității, Audit, Revizuire, Alte Servicii de Asigurare și Servicii Conexe. Manualul de Reglementări Internaționale de Control al Calității, Audit, Revizuire, Alte Servicii de Asigurare și Servicii Conexe. I. Retrieved from https://www.iaasb.org/_flysystem/azure-private/publications/files/2020-IAASB-Handbook_Volume-1_RO_Secure.pdf
Ifergan, P., & Bescos, P. L. (2010). Les Facteurs Objectifs de la Complexité de la Tache en Audit Légal. Paper presented at the Crises et Nouvelles Problématiques de la Valeur, France.
Ittonen, K., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). Female Auditors and Accruals Quality. Accounting Horizons, 27(2), 205-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/acch-50400
Jenkins, D. S., & Velury, U. (2008). Does Auditor Tenure Influence The Reporting of Conservative Earnings? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(2), 115-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.01.005
Jiang, J., Wang, I. Y., & Wang, K. P. (2019). Big N Auditors and Audit Quality: New Evidence from Quasi-Experiments. The Accounting Review, 94(1), 205-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-52106
Kalita, N., & Tiwari, R. K. (2023). Audit Quality Review: An Analysis Projecting the Past, Present, and Future. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 70(3), 353-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2023-0032
Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit Quality: Insights from the Academic Literature. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 32(1), 385-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50350
Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, M. (2015). Does the Identity of Engagement Partners Matter? An Analysis of Audit Partner Reporting Decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), 1443-1478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12113
Kung, F. H., Chang, Y. S., & Zhou, M. (2019). The Effect of Gender Composition in Joint Audits on Earnings Management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(5), 549-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2018-1885
Lopes, A. P. (2018). Audit Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from Portugal. Athens Journal of Business & Economics, 4(2), 179-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.30958/ajbe.4.2.4
Martani, D., Rahmah, N. A., Fitriany, F., & Anggraita, V. (2021). Impact of Audit Tenure and Audit Rotation on the Audit Quality: Big 4 vs Non Big 4. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1901395
Menezes Montenegro, T., & Bras, F. A. (2015). Audit Quality: Does Gender Composition of Audit Firms Matter? . Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 44(3), 264-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2015.1035578
Nettle, D. (2007). Empathizing and Systemizing: What are They, and What Do They Contribute to Our Understanding of Psychological Sex Differences? British Journal of Psychology, 98(2), 237-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712606X117612
Parris, D. L., Dapko, J. L., Arnold, R. W., & Arnold, D. (2016). Exploring transparency: A New Framework for Responsible Business Management. Management Decision, 54(1), 222-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2015-0279
Rajgopal, S., Srinivasan, S., & Zheng, X. (2021). Measuring Audit Quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(2), 559-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09570-9
Solichin, M., Sanusi, Z., Johari, R. J., Gunarsih, T., & Shafie, N. A. (2022). Analysis of Audit Competencies and Internal Control on Detecting Potential Fraud Occurrences. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(1), 171-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2022.100118
Srinidhi, B., Yang, Z., & Zhang, K. Y. (2017). Audit Partner Gender Diversity and Audit Quality. SSRN 1(August), 1-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3025235
Svanström, T. (2013). Non-Audit Services and Audit Quality: Evidence from Private Firms. European Accounting Review, 22(2), 337-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.706398
Wallace, W. A. (2004). The Economic Role of the Audit in Free and Regulated Markets: A Look Back and a Look Forward. Research in Accounting Regulation, 17(1), 267-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1052-0457(04)17012-4
Weisberg, Y. J., Deyoung, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2011). Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(August), 178. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178
Werner, M., Schultz, M., Müller-Wickop, N., Gehrke, N., & Nüttgens, M. (2012). Tackling Complexity: Process Reconstruction and Graph Transformation for Financial Audits. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems,, Orlando.
Zahmatkesh, S., & Rezazadeh, J. (2017). The effect of auditor features on audit quality. Tékhne, 15(2), 79-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tekhne.2017.09.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Grosu, Bogdan Narcis Fîrțescu, Raluca Andreev, Camelia Cătălina Mihalciuc
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
This work is licenced under a 
