Strong Competition Among Audit Companies and Power to Achieve Higher Audit Fees: Who is at the Forefront?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/saeb-2018-0012Keywords:
auditing, audit fee, Slovenia, Big 4 in forefront, small auditing companyAbstract
The aim of the research is to determine if the audit fees are statistically significantly different between the audit companies and vary, depending on the size of client and audit company. We find that for large auditees the average audit fees of the Big 4 Group did not statistically significantly deviate from normative audit fees, even surpass them, but not statistically significant. On average, small audit firms when auditing large auditees do not meet the predicted normative audit fees, and this deviation is statistically significant. Also, we confirm that the Big 4 auditing companies (KPMG, E & Y, Deloitte and PwC) were, statistically, significantly more likely to charge higher audit fees than a small auditing company would charge. The paper contributes to the literature to give users a clear indication about what average audit fees are typical of the Slovenian audit companies and which audit company is at the forefront.
JEL Codes - M42; M48; D40References
Abidin, S., Beattie, V., and Goodacre, A., 2010. Audit market structure, fees and choice in a period of structural change: Evidence from the IK - 1998-2003. The British Accounting Review, 42(3), 187-206. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2010.04.002
Accountingweb, 2015. Survey: Public and Private Company Audit Fees Went Up in 2013. from http://www.accountingweb.com/practice/practice-excellence/survey-public-and-private-company-audit-fees-went-up-in-2013
AJPES, 2016. Audited annual reports for companies. from https://www.ajpes.si/Registers/Annual_Reports
Anderson, T., and Zeghal, D., 1994. The pricing of audit services: Further evidence from the Canadian market. Accounting and Business Research, 24(95), 195-207. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1994.9729479
Asthana, S. C., and Boone, J. P., 2012. Abnormal Audit Fee and Audit Quality. Auditing, 31(3), 1-22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10294
Barragato, C. A., and Markelevich, A., 2008. Earnings quality following corporate acquisitions. Managerial Finance, 34(5), 304-315. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074350810866180
Brandon, D. M., Carver, B. T., Hollingsworth, C. W., and Stanley, J. D., 2012. Causes and Consequences of Recent Auditor Switching. The CPA Journal, 82(2), 36-39.
Choi, J.-H., Kim, C., Kim, J.-B., and Zang, Y., 2010. Audit office size, audit quality and audit pricing. Auditing, 29(1), 73-97. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.73
Cokelc, S., and Stager, V., 2016. Cene revizijskih storitev. Sirius, 2(1), 40-77.
Cullinan, C. P., and Du, H., 2010. Big 4, "Next 4", and Smaller Accounting Firms: Resignations v. Dismissals and the Outcome of the Auditor Change process. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 16(1), 58-64.
DeAngelo, L. E., 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
Duhovnik, M., 2016. This is not America: The Impact of the New EU Audit Regulation in Slovenia. Economic and Business Review, 18(2), 227-246.
Ettredge, M. L., Scholz, S., and Li, C., 2007. Audit Fees and Auditor Dismissals in the Sarbanes-Oxley Era. Accounting Horizons, 21(4), 371-386. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.4.371
European Commision, 2010. Revizijska politika: kaj smo se naučili iz krize. Zelena knjiga. Bruselj: Evropska komisija.
Evans, L. J., and Schwartz, J., 2014. The effect of concentration and regulation o audit fees: An application of panel data techniques. Journal of Empirical Finance, 27(0), 130-144. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2013.10.007
Francis, J. R., Reichelt, K., and Wang, D., 2005. The Pricing of National and City-specific reputations for Industry Expertise in the U.S. Audit Markets. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 113-136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.113
Francis, J. R., and Simon, D. T., 1987. A test of audit pricing in the small-client segmentation of the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review, LXII(1), 145-157.
Giroux, G., and McLelland, A., 2008. A Municipal Audit Fee Model Using Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Applied Business Research, 24(3), 135-146.
Gonthier‐Besacier, N., and Schatt, A., 2007. Determinants of Audit Fees for French Quoted Firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 139-160. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02686900710718654
Hallak, R. T. P., and da Silva, A. L. C., 2012. Determinantes das despesas com serviços de auditoria e consultoria prestados pelo auditor independente no Brasil. [Determinants of audit and non-audit fees provided by independent auditors in Brazil]. Revista Contabilidade & Financas, 23(60), 223-231. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772012000300007
Hassan, Y. M., and Naser, K., 2013. Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from an emerging economy. International Business Research, 6(8), 13-25.
Köhler, A. G., Marten, K.-U., Ratzinger, N. V., and Wagner, M., 2010. Prűfungshonorare in Deutschland – Determinanten und Implikationen. Zeitschrift fűr Betriebswirtschaft, 80(1), 5-29.
Komadina, D., 2014. Analiza dejavnikov cen revizijskih storitev v Sloveniji. Ljubljana: Ekonomska fakulteta.
Le Vourcʼh, J., and Morand, P., 2011. Study on the effects of the implementation of the acquis on statutory audits of annual and consolidated accounts including the consequences on the audit market. Paris: ESCP Europe.
Maher, M. W., Tiessen, P., Colson, R., and Broman, A. J., 1992. Competition and audit fees. The Accounting Review, 67(1), 199-210.
Menon, K., and Williams, D. D., 2001. Long-term trend in audit fees. Auditing, 20(1), 115-136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/aud.2001.20.1.115
Naser, K., and Nuseibeh, R., 2008. Determinants of audit fees: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 17(3), 239-254. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10569210710833635
Palmrose, Z. V., 1986. Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97-110. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2490806
Pavlič, B., 2015. Analiza cen revidiranja slovenskih nejavnih delniških družb. Ljubljana: Ekonomska fakulteta.
Picconi, M., and Reynolds, J. K., 2013. Audit Fee Theory and Estimation: A Consideration of the Logarithmic Audit Fee Model. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228419938_Audit_fee_theory_and_estimation_A_consideration_of_the_log-log_audit_fee_model.
Ramzy, W. A. M., 1988. The Determinants of Audit Fees - an Analitical Study. Edinbrugh: Heriot – Watt University.
Salihović, A., 2014. Analiza koncentracije na trgu revizijskih storitev v Sloveniji. Ljubljana: Ekonomska fakulteta.
Salihović, A., and Zaman, G. M., 2015. Analiza koncentracije na trgu revizijskih storitev v Sloveniji. Sirius, 1, 38-56.
Simunic, D. A., 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161-190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2490397
Skitek, M., 2009. Kritična obravnava zagotavljanja finančne neodvisnosti revizijskih družb pri revidiranju računovodskih izkazov. Ljubljana: Ekonomska fakulteta.
Velte, P., and Stiglbauer, M., 2012. Audit Market Concentration and Its Influence on Audit Quality. International Business Research, 5(11), 146-161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n11p146
Zaman Groff, M., and Valentincic, A., 2011. Determinants of Voluntary Audit Committee Formation in a Two-Tier Board System of a Post-transitional Economy - The Case of Slovenia. Accounting in Europe, 8(2), 235-256. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2011.621674
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 SCIENTIFIC ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.