Gender Diversity in Boardrooms and on Supervisory Boards and its Relation to Stock Prices

Authors

  • Marie Ligocká

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2020-0010

Keywords:

Gender equality, Stock prices, Boardroom, Supervisory board, GMM method

Abstract

Despite the fact that the labour force participation rate of women declined in the company bodies of publicly traded companies in 2017, there has been a growing representation of women in these positions in Europe. The representation of women is important due to the use of available human resources, the improvement in the quality of human capital and the positive effect on economic development. Gender imbalance in the management and supervisory bodies of publicly traded companies can be associated with lower management effectiveness, a decision-making quality that can influence the business situation of companies, which could be related to stock price development. Thus, this paper is focuses on examining the relationship between gender diversity in boardrooms and on supervisory boards and the stock prices of selected European publicly traded companies. The results show that there are dissimilar relations between stock prices and gender variables among the sectors and countries analysed.

JEL Codes - C58, G34, J16, O52

References

Adams, R. B., and Ferreira, D., 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

Ahern, K. R., and Dittmar, A. K., 2012. The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137-197. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1093/qje/qjr049

Barbieri, L., 2006. Panel Unit Root Tests: A Review. Working paper Serie Rossa: Economia – Quaderno, 43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252756953_Panel_Unit_Root_Tests_A_Review.

Campbell, K., and Minguez-Vera, A., 2008. Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435-451. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y

Catalyst, 2019. Women in Management: Quick Take. from https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-management/

Cipra, T., 2008. Financni ekonometrie (1st ed. ed.). Prague: Ekopress.

Dezso, C. L., and Ross, D. G., 2012. Does Female Representation in Top Management Improve Firm Performance? A Panel Data Investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1002/smj.1955

Dobbin, F., and Jung, J., 2011. Corporate Board Gender Diversity and Stock Performance: The Competence Gap or Institutional Investor Bias? North Carolina Law Review, 89(3), 809-838.

European Institute for Gender Equality, 2019a. Gender Equality Index. from https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2015/countries-comparison

European Institute for Gender Equality, 2019b. Gender Equality Index Publications. from https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/publications

European Institute for Gender Equality, 2019c. Gender Statistics Database. from https://eige.europa.eu/genderstatistics/dgs/indicator/wmidm_bus_bus__wmid_comp_compbm/bar

Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., and Ng, A. C., 2011. Does Board Gender Diversity Improve the Informativeness of Stock Prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314-338. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.01.005

Hall, A. R., 2005. Generalized Method of Moments (1st ed. ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., and Atkins, C., 2010. Investing with Prejudice: The Relationship Between Women's Presence on Company Boards and Objective and Subjective Measures of Company Performance. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 484-497. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00670.x

Levin, A., Lin, C. H. F., and Chu, C. H. S. J., 2002. Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7

Pesaran, M. H., 2015. Time Series and Panel Data Econometrics (1st ed. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736912.001.0001

Ramirez, S. A., 2000. Diversity and the Boardroom. Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, 6(1), 85-134.

Smith, N., Smith, V., and Verner, M., 2005. Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2 500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569-593. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1108/17410400610702160

The World Bank, 2019. World Bank Open Data. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS?end=2017&locations=AT-DE-PL&name_desc=false&start=2005

Toudas, K., Bellas, A., and Makridis, G., 2007. Corporate Governance and its Effect on Firm Value and Stock Returns of Listed Companies on the Athens Stock Exchange. European Research Studies Journal, 17(2), 58-80.

Wolfers, J., 2006. Diagnosing Discrimination: Stock Returns and CEO Gender. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(2-3), 531-541. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:10.1162/jeea.2006.4.2-3.531

Zdeněk, D., and et al., 2014. Ženy a management, Kreativita – inovace – etika – kvalitativní management. Brno: BizBooks.

Zivot, E., and Wang, J., 2006. Modeling Financial Time Series with S-PLUS (2nd ed. ed.). New York: Springer.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Ligocká, M. (2020). Gender Diversity in Boardrooms and on Supervisory Boards and its Relation to Stock Prices. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 67(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2020-0010

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.