Worldwide Fiscal Progressivity: What can we Learn from Subjective Wellbeing Economics?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2023-0011Keywords:
progressivity, subjective well-being, taxation, Quality of life, happiness.Abstract
The link between fiscal progressivity and subjective well-being at global level is an issue that has hardly been considered in the literature on the Economics of Happiness. Oishi et al. (2012) is almost the only work in this field, and they concluded that those countries which had more progressive income tax systems were also happier. Our work use their definition of progressivity as the difference between the upper and lower marginal rate on income, in order to prove its relationship with subjective well-being (SWB), but we have observed that such indicator is not very significant for a sample of 111 countries. Besides, we conclude that the fact that a country's maximum income tax rate is high turns out to have a strong influence on the declared subjective well-being of its citizens. One possible explanation for it could be that they are countries with a high GDP per capita in which disposable income after taxes remains high. However, it must be taken into account that in our work we have managed to isolate the influences that the GDP per capita variable could have using the principal component analysis method.
References
Abdur Rahman, A., & Veenhoven, R. (2018). Freedom and Happiness in Nations: A Research Synthesis. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13(2), 435-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9543-6
Akay, A., Bargain, O., Dolls, M., Neumann, D., Peichl, A., & Siegloch, S. (2012). Happy Taxpayers? Income Taxation and Well-Being. SOEPpaper, 526(December), 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2197826
Bjørnskov, C., Boettke, P. J., Booth, P., Coyne, C. J., De Vos, M., Ormerod, P., . . . Stevenson, B. (2012). ... and the Pursuit of Happiness-Wellbeing and the Role of Government. Institute of Economic Affairs Monographs. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3922106 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3922106
Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. (2007). The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice, 130(3-4), 267-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9081-5
Boarini, R., Comola, M., Smith, C., Manchin, R., & De Keulenaer, F. (2012). What makes for a better life?: The determinants of subjective well-being in OECD countries–Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. OECD Statistics Working Papers(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/18152031
Díaz Vázquez, R., Portela Maseda, M., & Neira Gomez, I. (2011). Welfare and happiness: Influence of Income and Social Capital in European Countries. Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business, 20, 1-29.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x
Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (1995). Factors Predicting the Subjective Well-Being of Nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.851
Eurostat. (2014). Taxation Trends in the European Union1, 2014. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2013). Happiness Economics. SERIEs -Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 4(1), 35-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13209-012-0086-7
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How Important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness. Economic Journal (London), 114(497), 641-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00235.x
Grimes, A., Ormsby, J., Robinson, A., & Wong, S. (2016). Subjective wellbeing impacts of national and subnational fiscal policies. Motu Working Paper 16-05, (April). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2759636
Gruber, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/1538-0637.1412
Iglesias-Vazquez, E. M., López, J. A. P., & Santos, J. M. S. (2013). Subjective wellbeing, income and relational goods The determinants of happiness in Spain. International Journal of Sociology, 71(3), 567-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ris.2012.04.11
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355397555235
Kendall, M. (1958). A course in multivariate analysis. London: Charles Griffin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020268100037422
Layard, R. (1980). Human Satisfactions and Public Policy. The Economic Journal, 90(360), 737-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2231740
Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and Public Policy: A Challenge to the Profession. Economic Journal (London), 116(510), C24-C33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01073.x
Layard, R. (2020). Can we be happier? Evidence and ethics. London: Pelican.
Lubian, D., & Zarri, L. (2011). Happiness and Tax Morale: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80(1), 223-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.03.009
Martela, F., Greve, B., Rothstein, B., & Saari, J. (2020). The Nordic exceptionalism: What explains why the Nordic countries are constantly among the happiest in the world. World happiness report, 128-145.
Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation. The Review of Economic Studies, 38(2), 175-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2296779
Oishi, S., Kushlev, K., & Schimmack, U. (2018). Progressive taxation, income inequality, and happiness. The American Psychologist, 73(2), 157-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000166
Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2012). Progressive taxation and the subjective well-being of nations. Psychological Science, 23(1), 86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611420882
Oswald, A. J. (1983). Altruism, jealousy and the theory of optimal non-linear taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 20(1), 77-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(83)90021-X
Piketty, T. (2015). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard: Belknap Press.
Rojas, M. (2018). Happiness in Latin America has social foundations. World happiness report, 89-114.
Tavits, M. (2008). Representation, Corruption, and Subjective Well-Being. Comparative Political Studies, 41(12), 1607-1630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414007308537
van Praag, B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198286546.001.0001
van Praag, B., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2006). An almost integration: Free approach to ordered response models6. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/86506
Velásquez, L. (2016). The importance of relational goods for happiness: Evidence from Manizales, Colombia Handbook of happiness research in Latin America (pp. 91-112): Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7203-7_6
Weisbach, D. (2008). What does happiness research tell us about taxation? The Journal of Legal Studies, 37, S293-S324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/529073
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Angela Ruíz Guillermo, Francisco Gómez García, Luis Palma Martos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.