MACROECONOMIC DIMENSIONS IN THE CLUSTERIZATION PROCESSES: LITHUANIAN BIOMASS CLUSTER CASE

Authors

  • Valentinas NAVICKAS
  • Mantas SVAZAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2017-0003

Keywords:

clusterization, macroeconomic strategies, cost–benefit analysis, biomass cluster

Abstract

The Future production systems’ increasing significance will impose work, which maintains not a competitive, but a collaboration basis, with concentrated resources and expertise, which can help to reach the general purpose. One form of collaboration among medium-size business organizations is work in clusters. Clusterization as a phenomenon has been known from quite a long time, but it offers simple benefits to researches at micro and medium levels. The clusterization process evaluation in macroeconomic dimensions has been comparatively little investigated. Thereby, in this article, the clusterization processes is analysed by concentrating our attention on macroeconomic factor researches. The authors analyse clusterization’s influence on country’s macroeconomic growth; they apply a structure research methodology for clusterization’s macroeconomic influence evaluation and propose that clusterization processes benefit macroeconomic analysis. The theoretical model of clusterization processes was validated by referring to a biomass cluster case. Because biomass cluster case is a new phenomenon, currently there are no other scientific approaches to them. The authors’ accomplished researches show that clusterization allows the achievement of a large positive slip in macroeconomics, which proves to lead to a high value added to creation, a faster country economic growth, and social situation amelioration.

JEL Codes - B22, M21, O11

References

Baranauskienė, J., 2013. Viešųjų projektų vertinimas kaštų naudos analizės metodu: kritiškas požiūris. Žemės ūkio mokslai, 20 (1), pp. 64–74.

Bernat, A. G., 1999. Industry clusters and rural labor markets. Southern Rural Sociology, 15, pp. 13–23.

Čiburienė, J., Keršienė, R., 2002. Klasterių esmė ir jų formavimasis. TILTAI, PRIEDAS. Transformacijos Rytų ir centrinėje Europoje, 10, pp. 54-61.

do Carmo Farinha, L.M., de Matos Ferreira, J.J., Borges Gouvei, J.J., 2014. Innovation and competitiveness: a high-tech cluster approach. The Romanian Review Precision Mechanics, Optics & Mechatronics, 45, pp. 41-48.

Ginevičius, R. Andriuškevičius, A., 2000. Gamybos koncentracija rinkos ekonomikoje. Ekonomika, 51, pp. 20-29.

Ketels, C., Lindqvist, G., Sölvell, O., 2013. The Cluster Initiative Greenbook (2 edition), Stockholm: Ivory Tower Publishers.

Ketels, C., Lindqvist, G., Sölvell, O., 2006. Cluster initiatives

in developing and transition economies, Stockholm: Center for Strategy and Competitiveness.

Kuah, A.T.H., 2002. Cluster Theory and Practice: Advantages for the Small Business Locating in a Vibrant Cluster. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 4(3), pp. 206 – 228.

Lechner, C., Leyronas, C., 2012. The competitive advantage of cluster firms: the priority of regional network position over extra-regional networks – a study of a French high-tech cluster. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24, pp. 457–473.

OECD (2005). Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Business Clusters Promoting Enterprise in Central and Eastern Europe: Promoting Enterprise in Central and Eastern Europe, Paris: OECD Publishing.

Rakauskienė, G., 2013. Šalies konkurencingumo skatinimo sprendimų pagrįstumo didinimas, Vilnius: Technika.

Semlinger, K., 2008. Cooperation and competition in net

work governance: regional networks in a globalised economy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20 (6), pp. 547– 560.

Skaržauskienė, A., Gudelytė, L., Lančinskienė, A., 2014. Klasterių veikla Lietuvoje: iššūkiai ir galimybių paieška. Socialinės technologijos, 4(1), pp. 192–204.

Vaz, T. D. N., Nijkamp, P., 2009. Knowledge and innovation: The strings between global and local dimensions of sustainable growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 21 (4), pp. 441–455.

Vojtovich, S., 2013. The impact of Emigration on Unemployment in Slovakia. Engineering Economics, 24 (3), pp. 207-216.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-25

How to Cite

NAVICKAS, V., & SVAZAS, M. (2017). MACROECONOMIC DIMENSIONS IN THE CLUSTERIZATION PROCESSES: LITHUANIAN BIOMASS CLUSTER CASE. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 64(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2017-0003

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.