Sectoral Analysis of Environmental Economics: The View from Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2019-0028Keywords:
environmentally extended input-output tables, industry, Ukrainian reform, sustainable developmentAbstract
The study is devoted to environmentally extended input-output tables in the form of economic analysis based on the interdependencies between economic sectors. The Leontief-Ford model is considered as a basic method for research. This model generalizes the Leontief model in two groups of industries (production): primary (sectors of material production) and secondary production (industry, dealing with the destruction of pollutants). The analysis of the sectoral structure gave a general view of the current situation in Ukraine. The regional breakdown requires the development and implementation of regional concepts, strategies, programs of ecological and economic development. They should be based on the Strategy of macroeconomic development with the priority of the ecological economy formation, and its goals are formulated and based on the analysis of the sectoral structure of the economy. The short-term strategy should be based on structural changes in the economy with a gradual minimization of resource intensity and waste generation.
JEL Codes - B22; C67; C68; P52References
Alejandro Cardenete, M., and Sancho, F., 2006. Missing Links in Key Sector Analysis. Economic Systems Research, 18(3), 319-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09535310600844409
Apostoaie, C. M., and Maxim, A., 2017. Political Determinants of National Environmental Performance in the European Union. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(1), 277-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n1p277
Aroche-Reyes, F., 2003. A Qualitative Input-Output Method to Find Basic Economic Structures. Papers in Regional Science, 82(4), 581-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10110-003-0149-z
Ayres, R., and Kneese, A., 1969. Production, Consumption and Externalities. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 282-297.
Barker, T., 1981. Projecting Economic Structure with a Large-Scale Econometric Model. Futures, 13(6), 458-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(81)90101-4
Berry, R. S., and Fels, M. F., 1973. The energy cost of automobiles, Science and public affairs. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 10, 58-60.
Bicknell, K. B., Ball, R. J., Cullen, R., and Bigsby, H. R., 1998. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy. Ecological Economics, 27(2), 149-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00136-5
Bullard, C. W., and Herendeen, R. A., 1975. The energy cost of goods and services. Energy Policy, 3(4), 268-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(75)90035-X
Bullard, C. W., Penner, P. S., and Pilati, D. A., 1978. Net energy analysis: Handbook for combining process and input-output analysis. Resources and Energy, 1(3), 267-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0572(78)90008-7
Chapman, P. F., 1974. The energy costs of producing copper and aluminium from primary sources. Metals and Materials, 8, 107-111.
Cleveland, C. J., Costanza, R., Hall, C. A. S., and Kaufmann, R., 1984. Energy and the u.s. Economy: A biophysical perspective. Science, 225(4665), 890-897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.225.4665.890
Duchin, F., 1992. Industrial input-output analysis: Implications for industrial ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89(3), 851-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.3.851
Duchin, F., and Lange, G., 1994. The Future of the Environment: Ecological Economics and Technological Change. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ferrer, G., and Ayres, R. U., 2000. The Impact of Remanufacturing in the Economy. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 413-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00110-X
Forsund, F. R., and Strom, S., 1976. The generation of residual flows in Norway: An input-output approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 3(2), 129-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(76)90027-9
Gay, P. W., and Proops, J. L. R., 1993. Carbon Dioxide Production by the UK Economy: An Input-Output. Assessment Applied Energy, 44(2), 113-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-2619(93)90057-V
Giljum, S., and Hubacek, K., 2004. Alternative Approaches of Physical Input-Output Analysis to Estimate Primary Material Inputs of Production and Consumption Activities. Economic Systems Research, 16(3), 301-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0953531042000239383
Grygorkiv, V., and Biloskurskyy, R., 2007. Some stochastic Leontief-Ford models and their deterministic. Journal of Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 43(3), 315-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10559-007-0051-9
Grygorkiv, V., Verstiak, V., and Grygorkiv, M., 2014. Analysis for the National Economies Based on Aggregated Input-Output Models. International scientific research journal of Mykolas Romeris University, 8(1), 178-186.
Hoekstra, R., and van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., 2002. Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical Flows in the Economy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(3), 357-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021234216845
Holubka, S., Shtuler, I., and Biloskurskyy, R., 2017. Financing actions of environmental and economic development in Ukraine. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 2(23), 437-445.
Kananen, I., Korhonen, P., Wallenius, J., and Wallenius, H., 1990. Multiple Objective Analysis of Input-Output Models for Emergency. Management Operations Research, 38(2), 193-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.38.2.193
Khvesyk, M., Shubalyi, A., and Golyan, V., 2017. Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine). Folia Forestalia Polonica, 59(3), 207-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2017-0022
Lange, G. M., 1998. Applying an integrated natural resource accounts and input-output model to development planning in Indonesia. Economic Systems Research, 10(2), 98-105.
Lantner, R., and Carluer, F., 2004. Spatial Dominance: A New Approach to the Estimation of Interconnectedness in Regional Input-Output Tables. The Annals of Regional Science, 38(3), 451-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-003-0178-1
Lenzen, M., 2003. Environmentally Important Paths, Linkages and Key Sectors in the Australian Economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14(1), 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(02)00025-5
Leontief, W. W., 1966. Input-Output Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leontief, W. W., 1974. Structure of the World Economy. Outline of a Simple Input-Output Formulation. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 76(4), 387-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3439247
Leontief, W. W., and Daniel, F., 1972. Air Pollution and the Economic Structure: Empirical Results of Input-Output Computations. In A. Brody and A. P. Carter (Eds.), Input-Output Techniques (pp. 9-23). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Luptacik, M., and Bohm, B., 1994. An Environmental Input-Output Model with Multiple Criteria. Annals of Operations Research, 54(1), 119-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02031730
Moffatt, I., and Hanley, N., 2001. Modelling Sustainable Development: Systems Dynamic and Input-Ouput Approaches. Environmental Modelling and Software with Environment Data News, 16(6), 545-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00024-X
Nakamura, S., 1999. An Interindustry Approach to Analyzing Economic and Environmental Effects of the Recycling of Waste. Ecological Economics, 28(1), 133-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00031-7
Peters, G., and Hertwich, E., 2006. Pollution Embodied in Trade: The Norwegian Case. Global Environmental Change, 16(4), 379-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.001
Proops, J. L. R., 1977. Input-Output Analysis and Energy Intensities: A Comparison of Some. Methodologies Applied Mathematical Modelling, 1(4), 181-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0307-904X(77)90003-8
Shmelev, S., 2011. Ecological Economics: Sustainability in Practice: Springer.
Smahliuk, A., 2015. Industry and technological structure of Ukraine’s economy. Theory and practice of public administration, 2(49), 177-183.
Sonis, M., and Hewings, G. J. D., 1998. Economic Complexity as Network Complication: Multiregional Input-Output Structural Path Analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 32(3), 407-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001680050081
State statistic services of Ukraine, 2015. Innovative activity of industrial enterprises of Ukraine. from http://bit.do/faDHE
State statistic services of Ukraine, 2017. Waste generation by types of economic activity. from http://bit.do/faDH8
State statistic services of Ukraine, 2018. Gross domestic product and gross added value by type of economic activity 2018. Statistical summary. from http://bit.do/faDJj
Suh, S., 2005. Theory of materials and energy flow analysis in ecology and economics. Ecological Modelling, 189(3), 251-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.011
Tarancón Morán, M. A., and del Río González, P., 2007. A Combined Input-Output and Sensitivity Analysis Approach to Analyse Sector Linkages and CO 2 Emissions. Energy Economics, 29(3), 578-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.02.004
Thijs Ten, R., 2009. Input-output economics: theory and applications: featuring Asian economies: World Scientific.
Tunytsya, Y., and Tunytsya, T., 2017. An ecological economic paradigm for sustainable forestry development. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU 27, 27(8), 21-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/40270802
Vinnychuk, O., Grygorkiv, V., and Biloskurskyy, R., 2015. The dynamic model of optimal economic growth in terms of ecological balance: Models construction and results analysis. Business Systems and Economics, 5(1), 36-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.13165/VSE-15-5-1-04
Wright, D. J., 1974. Goods and services: An input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 2(4), 307-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(74)90017-2
Zianko, V., 2014. The essence and need to move towards sustainable economic development. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 1(154), 14-17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 SCIENTIFIC ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.