CONCEPTUALIZATION AND OPERATIONALISATION OF SPECIFIC VARIABLES IN EXPLORATORY RESEARCHES – AN EXAMPLE FOR BUSINESS NEGOTIATION

Authors

  • Adriana ZAIT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2016-0109

Keywords:

variable conceptualization, operationalisation, exploratory research, research methodology, business negotiation, cultural factors

Abstract

In exploratory researches we are looking for clues, trying to get a better picture of the research variables and relationships. Besides variables already studied, identified in the literature review, we might deal with specific variables – for the investigated subject and socio-cultural region – the ones that might lead us to new explanations and theories. These new variables can be depicted from in-depth interviews and informal discussions with intervening actors, through a process of identification, conceptualization (obtaining theoretical definitions), and operationalisation (suggesting ways for the measurement of the identified variables). The present paper offers an example of such a process for a particular subject – identifying potential specific influences on the business negotiation behaviour. The focus is on the methodological aspects of such a research endeavour.

JEL Codes - L22, L25, M10, M14, M16

References

Adair, W. L., and Brett, J. M., 2005. The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16(1), 33-51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0102

Bendersky, C., and Curhan, J. R., 2009. Cognitive dissonance in negotiation: Free choice or justification? Social Cognition, 27(3), 455-474. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.3.455

Caputo, A., 2013. A literature review of cognitive biases in negotiation processes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24(4), 374-398. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-08-2012-0064

Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., and Levy, P. E., 2009. The Development and Validation of a New Machiavellianism Scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219-257. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318618

Drollinger, T., Comer, L. B., and Warrington, P. T., 2006. Development and validation of the Active Empathetic Listening scale. Psychology and Marketing, 23(2), 161-180. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.20105

Durvasula, S., and Lysonski, S., 2008. A double-edged sword: understanding vanity across cultures. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(4), 230-244. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363760810882425

Durvasula, S., Lysonski, S., and Watson, J., 2001. Does vanity describe other cultures? A cross-cultural examination of the vanity scale. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 180-199. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00108.x

Ger, G., and Belk, R. W., 1996. Cross-cultural differences in materialism. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(1), 55-77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(95)00035-6

Gheorghiu, M. A., Vignoles, V. L., and Smith, P. B., 2009. Beyond the United States and Japan: Testing Yamagishi's Emancipation Theory of Trust across 31 Nations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(4), 365-383. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200408

Hall, E. H., and Lee, J., 2012. Conceptual operationalisation issues within the context of an international study: Japanese and American firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 97-120.

Kapoutsis, I., Volkema, R. J., and Nikolopoulos, A. G., 2013. Initiating Negotiations: The Role of Machiavellianism, Risk Propensity, and Bargaining Power. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(6), 1081-1101. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9306-6

Krekels, G., and Pandelaere, M., 2015. Dispositional greed. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 225-230. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.036

Lin, X., and Miller, S. J., 2003. Negotiation approaches: Direct and indirect effect of national culture. International Marketing Review, 20(3), 286-303. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02651330310477602

Luomala, H. T., Kumar, R., Singh, J. D., and Jaakkola, M., 2015. When an Intercultural Business Negotiation Fails: Comparing the Emotions and Behavioural Tendencies of Individualistic and Collectivistic Negotiators. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(3), 537-561. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-014-9420-8

Möllering, G., Bachmann, R., and Lee, S. H., 2004. Introduction: Understanding organizational trust - foundations, constellations, and issues of operationalisation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 556-570. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683940410551480

Moyano, M., Tabernero, C., Melero, R., and Trujillo, H. M., 2015. Spanish version of the Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS) / Versión española de la Escala de Inteligencia Cultural (EIC). Revista de Psicología Social, 30(1), 182-216. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2014.991520

Perng, S. J., and Watson, R., 2012. Construct validation of the nurse cultural competence scale: A hierarchy of abilities. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(11-12), 1678-1684. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03933.x

Rapp, J. K., Bernardi, R. A., and Bosco, S. M., 2011. Examining the use of Hofstede's uncertainty avoidance construct in international research: A 25 year review. International Business Research, 4(1), 1-15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v4n1p3

Reynolds, N., Simintiras, A., and Vlachou, E., 2003. International business negotiations: Present knowledge and direction for future research. International Marketing Review, 20(3), 236-261. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02651330310477585

Rohrmann, B., 2005. Risk attitude scales: concepts, questionnaires, utilizations. from www.rohrmannresearch.net Sarkar, A. N., 2010. Emerging strategic issues in global business negotiation: sharing global vision. Drishtikon: A Management Journal, 1(2), 1-36.

Scherbaum, C. A., and Meade, A. W., 2013. New Directions for Measurement in Management Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 132-148. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12003 Shi, X., 2001. Antecedent factors of international business negotiations in China context. Management International Review, 41(2), 163-187.

Simintiras, A. C., and Thomas, A. H., 1998. Cross-Cultural Sales Negotiations: A Literature Review and Research Propositions. International Marketing Review, 15(1), 10-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004481

Song, Y. J., Hale, C. L., and Rao, N., 2004. Success and failure of business negotiations for South Koreans. Journal of International and Area Studies, 11(2), 45-65.

Stoshikj, M., 2014. Integrative and distributive negotiations and negotiation behavior. Journal of Service Science Research, 6(1), 29-69. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12927-014-0002-8

Teo, P. C., Mohamad, O., and Ramayah, T., 2011. Testing the dimensionality of Consumer Ethnocentrism Scale (CETSCALE) among a young Malaysian consumer market segment. African Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 2805-2816. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJBM10.1185

Tu, Y.-T., and Chih, H.-C., 2011. An Analysis on Negotiation Styles by Religious Beliefs. International Business Research, 4(3), 243-253. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v4n3p243

Warter, I., and Warter, L., 2015. Intercultural negotiation in mergers and acquisitions. The integration of the cultural dimension into the negotiation domain. Buletinul Institutului Politehnic din Iaşi, LXI(LXV), 73-86.

Zaiț, D., Spalanzani, A., and Zaiț, A., 2015. Construcția strategică a cercetării. Opțiuni metodologice - între logic și euristic. Iași: Editura Sedcom Libris

Zaiț, D., Warter, L., and Warter, I., 2014. Cross-cultural incentives for the FDI. Cross-Cultural Management Journal, XVI(1 ), 209-221. Zaiț, D., and Zaiț, A., 2009. Research Anticipation: the Methodological Choice. Review of International Comparative Management, 10(5), 902-909.

Zhu, X., and Gao, D., 2013. Nothing Succeeds Like Success. International Studies of Management & Organization, 43(4), 26-38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825430402

Downloads

Published

2016-03-03

How to Cite

ZAIT, A. (2016). CONCEPTUALIZATION AND OPERATIONALISATION OF SPECIFIC VARIABLES IN EXPLORATORY RESEARCHES – AN EXAMPLE FOR BUSINESS NEGOTIATION. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 63(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2016-0109

Issue

Section

Articles