“There is no Alternative” for Southern European National Parties: Analysing Programmatic Convergence on Economic and Monetary Policy Issues in Euroelection Manifestos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2025-0018Keywords:
Eurozone Debt crisis, Economic and Monetary Union, European elections, Europeanization, Eurozone, Southern Europe.Abstract
Drawing on a framework combining Europeanization with a critical political economy approach, this research aims to assess if the Eurozone crisis induced an ideological and programmatic convergence of national parties in four Southern European member states: Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Based on the quantitative analysis of parties’ ideological classification and of Euroelection Manifestos’ content from 1999 to 2019, the research hypothesizes that the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) political economy and, particularly, the Eurozone crisis effects on Southern Europe created a “no alternative” policy for national governments, thus impelling parties to ideologically and programmatically converge with the supranational preferences for the EMU’s future. Conclusions indicate that the Eurozone crisis triggered a consensual turn to the left of national party systems, and a convergence on demands for Keynesian policies within the EMU. This reveals a contradiction between the political aspirations of national parties and their representative role, and their executive political commitments during the austerity-led governmental approach in the crisis.
References
Armingeon, K., & Cranmer, S. (2018). Position-Taking in the Euro Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(4), 546-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1268642
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261816
Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2003). Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The Politics of Europeanization (pp. 57-80). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199252092.003.0003
Carteny, G., Reinl, A. K., Braun, D., Popa, S. A., & Schmitt, H. (2023). European Parliament Election Study 1979–2019, Euromanifesto Study. GESIS, 3(1), 10-4232. http://dx.doi.org/10.4232/1.14120
Chang, M. (2009). Monetary Integration in the European Union (Vol. 13). London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01883-0
Chang, M., & Leblond, P. (2015). All in: Market Expectations of Eurozone Integrity in the Sovereign Debt Crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 22(3), 626-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2014.941905
Csehi, R., & Puetter, U. (2020). Who Determined what Governments Really Wanted? Preference Formation and the Euro Crisis. West European Politics, 44(3), 463-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1731666
Da Gonçalves Gonçalves, V., Sarmento, J. M., & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Aftermath of the Sovereign Debt Crisis, the New Challenges to Competitiveness in Portugal. Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 34(1), 998-1012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1812418
De Grauwe, P. (2012). Economics of Monetary Union (12th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Wilde, P., & Zürn, M. (2012). Can the Politicization of European Integration be Reversed? Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(S1), 137-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02232.x
Dinan, D. (2014). Europe Recast: A History of European Union (2nd ed. ed. Vol. 373). USA: Lynne Rienner. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-43645-0
Dorussen, H., & Nanou, K. (2006). European Integration, Intergovernmental Bargaining, and Convergence of Party Programmes. European Union Politics, 7(2), 235-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116506063709
European Parliament. (2022). 10 Years after “Whatever it Takes”: Fragmentation Risk in the Current Context. Monetary Dialogue Papers. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/249536/Bruegel_DEF.pdf
Filoso, V., Panico, C., Papagni, E., Purificato, F., & Vázquez Suárez, M. V. (2021). Timing Does Matter: Institutional Flaws and the European Debt Crisis. Review of Political Economy, 33(4), 769-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2020.1859717
Gabel, M., & Hix, S. (2002). Defining the EU Political Space: An empirical Study of the European Elections Manifestos, 1979–1999. Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 934-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001041402236309
Gerbet, P. (2016). The Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) on Economic and Monetary Union. The Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) on Economic and Monetary Union. Retrieved from https://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_intergovernmental_conference_igc_on_economic_and_monetary_union-en-148689f5-0174-45d0-9396-fc48c0d047cf.html
Glencross, A. (2014). Bleak Prospects? Varieties of Europessimism and their Application to the Eurozone Debt Crisis and the Future of Integration. Journal of European Integration, 36(4), 393-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.846338
Graziano, P., & Vink, M. P. (2007). Europeanization: New Research Agendas. New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584525
Hix, S., & Høyland, B. (2022). The political System of the European Union (Bloomsbury Ed. 4rd ed. ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34418-1
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (1999). The Making of a Polity: The Struggle over European Integration. In H. Kitschelt (Ed.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (pp. 70-98). UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175050.005
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A Post-Functionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
Hopkin, J. (2012). A Slow Fuse: Italy and the EU Debt Crisis. The International Spectator, 47(4), 35-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2012.735508
Hutter, S., & Grande, E. (2014). Politicizing Europe in the National Electoral Arena: A Comparative Analysis of Five West European Countries, 1970–2010. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(5), 1002-1018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12133
Hutter, S., & Kriesi, H. (2020). Politicizing Europe in Times of Crisis. In J. Zeitlin & F. Nicoli (Eds.), The European Union Beyond the Polycrisis? (1st ed., pp. 34-55): Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003002215-3
Katsanidou, A., & Otjes, S. (2016). How the European Debt Crisis Reshaped National Political Space: The Case of Greece. European Union Politics, 17(2), 262-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116515616196
Kneuer, M. (2019). The Tandem of Populism and Euroscepticism: A Comparative Perspective in the Light of the European Crises. Contemporary Social Science, 14(1), 26-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1426874
Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-National Policy Convergence: Concepts, Approaches and Explanatory Factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161332
Kriesi, H. (2016). The Politicization of European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54, 32-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12406
Krugman, P. (2013). Revenge of the Optimum Currency Area. NBER macroeconomics annual, 27(1), 439-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/669188
Ladrech, R. (2002). Europeanization and Political Parties: Towards a Framework for Analysis. Party Politics, 8(4), 389-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068802008004002
Ladrech, R. (2009). Europeanization and Political Parties. Living Reviews in European Governance, 4(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.12942/lreg-2009-1
Laffan, B. (2014). Testing Times: The Growing Primacy of Responsibility in the Euro Area. West European Politics, 37(2), 270-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887875
Laffan, B. (2016). Core-Periphery Dynamics in the Euro Area: From Conflict to Cleavage? In J. M. Magone, B. Laffan, & C. Schweiger (Eds.), Core-Periphery Relations in the European Union: Power and Conflict in a Dualist Political Economy (1st ed., pp. 19-34). New York: Routledge.
Lang, G. (2004). Les Politiques budgétaires et le Pacte de Stabilité. In M. Dévoluy (Ed.), Les Politiques Economiques Européennes (2e ed., Vol. 1, pp. 125-168). Glasgow: Éditions du Seuil. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/reof.074.0245
Mair, P. (2007). Political Opposition and European Union. Government and Opposition, 42(1), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00209.x
Mair, P. (2014). On Parties, Party Systems and Democracy: Selected Writings of Peter Mair. Brazilian Political Science Review, 10(3), 1-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-382120160003000013
Marks, G., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2004). Introduction: Models of Political Conflict in the European Union. In G. Marks & M. R. Steenbergen (Eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict (pp. 1-12). UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492013
Marks, G., Wilson, C. J., & Ray, L. (2002). National Political Parties and European Integration. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 585-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088401
Monaco, D. (2024). Neoliberalisation, Dissensus, and the Demise of Tripartite Bargaining in Italy after the 2011 Debt Crisis: A Gramscian ‘Common Sense’ Approach. Globalizations, 21(5), 950-969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2302982
Moury, C., & Standring, A. (2017). ‘Going beyond the Troika’: Power and Discourse in Portuguese Austerity Politics. European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 660-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12190
Nanou, K. (2013). Different Origins, Same Proposals? The Impacto of the EU in Policy Direction of Party Families. West European Politics, 36(1), 248-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.742759
Otjes, S., & Katsanidou, A. (2017). Beyond Kriesiland: EU Integration as a Super-Issue after the Eurocrisis. European Journal of Political Research, 56(2), 301-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12177
Otjes, S., & Van Der Veer, H. (2016). The Eurozone Crisis and the European Parliament’s Changing Lines of Conflict. European Union Politics, 17(2), 242-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116515622567
Parker, O., & Tsarouhas, D. (2018). Causes and Consequences of Crisis in the Eurozone Periphery. In O. Parker & D. Tsarouhas (Eds.), Crisis in the Eurozone periphery: The political economies of Greece, Spain, Ireland and Portugal (pp. 1-27). UK: Palgeave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69721-5
Pizzimenti, E., Calossi, E., Cicchi, L., & Masi, B. (2024). Do Parties Converge? An Empirical Analysis to Party Organizational and Policy Issue Saliency Change in Western Europe (1970-2010). Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32(1), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2119215
Quaglia, L., & Royo, S. (2015). Banks and the Political Economy of the Sovereign Debt Crisis in Italy and Spain. Review of International Political Economy, 22(3), 485-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.877059
Riekmann, S. P., & Wydra, D. (2013). Representation in the European State of Emergency: Parliaments Against Governments? Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 565-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.799943
Risse, T., Cowles, M. G., & Caporaso, J. (2001). Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction. In M. G. Cowles, J. Caporaso, & T. Risse (Eds.), Transforming Europe (Vol. 56, pp. 1-20). Italy: Cornell University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/9781501723575-002
Ryner, M. (2015). Europe’s Ordoliberal Iron Cage: Critical Political Economy, the Euro Area Crisis and its Management. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 275-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.995119
Schimmelfennig, F. (2015). Liberal Intergovernmentalism and the Euro Area Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 177-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.994020
Schoeller, M. G. (2019). Leadership in the Eurozone: The Role of Germany and the Euro Institutions (1st ed.): Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12704-6
Sebastião, D. (2021). Covid-19: A Different Economic Crisis but the Same Democratic Deficit in the EU. Politics and Governance, 9(2), 252-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.3923
Spoon, J., & Klüver, H. (2019). Party Convergence and Vote Switching: Explaining Mainstream Parties’ Decline Across Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1021-1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12331
Stiglitz, J. E. (2016). The Euro: How a Common Currency Threatens the Future of Europe (1st ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2018-0007
Stockhammer, E. (2016). Neoliberal Growth Models, Monetary Union, and the Euro Crisis: A Post-Keynesian Perspective. New Political Economy, 21(4), 365-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2016.1115826
Storm, S., & Naastepad, C. W. M. (2016). Myths, Mix-ups, and Mishandlings: Understanding the Eurozone Crisis. International Journal of Political Economy, 45(1), 46-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2016.1159084
Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2024). Euroscepticism and Anti-Establishment Parties in Europe. Journal of European Integration, 46(8), 1171-1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2024.2329634
Taggart, P., & Szczerbiak, A. (2018). Putting Brexit into Perspective: The Effect of the Eurozone and Migration Crises and Brexit on Euroscepticism in European States. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(8), 1194-1214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1467955
Tsebelis, G., & Garrett, G. (2000). Legislative Politics in the European Union. European Union Politics, 1(1), 9-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001001002
Van Der Eijk, C., & Franklin, M. N. (2004). Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe. In G. Marks & M. R. Steenbergen (Eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict (pp. 32-50). UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492013.004
Vink, M. P., & Graziano, P. (2007). Challenges of a New Research Agenda. In M. P. Vink & P. Graziano (Eds.), Europeanization: New Research Agendas (2007th ed., pp. 3-20). UK: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584525_1
Yener, H., Stengos, T., & Yazgan, E. (2017). Analysis of the Seeds of the Debt Crisis in Europe. European Journal of Finance, 23(15), 1589-1610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2016.1272474
Zeitlin, J., Nicoli, F., & Laffan, B. (2020). Introduction. In J. Zeitlin, F. Nicoli, & B. Laffan (Eds.), The European Union beyond the polycrisis? Integration and Politicization in an Age of Shifting Cleavages (1st ed., pp. 13-28). UK: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003002215-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dina Sebastião , Vanda Amaro Dias

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.