Resilience to Online Privacy Violation: Developing a Typology of Consumers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2023-0028Keywords:
resilience, online privacy violation, privacy concern, consumer typology, Croatia.Abstract
This study examines which segments of population with similar resilience to online privacy violation, severity of online privacy violation, and attitudes towards online privacy concern exist in Croatia, and whether they can be differentiated by demographic characteristics and attitudes towards other online constructs. Research is performed on a representative sample of Croatian Internet users who experienced online privacy violation. The survey data were analyzed using factor analysis, k-means cluster analysis, chi-square test and ANOVA. The findings indicate three groups of consumers with: (1) low-resilience, (2) moderate-resilience, and (3) high-resilience; who differ in age, income, and online buying habits.
References
Afolabi, O. O., Ozturen, A., & Ilkan, M. (2021). Effects of privacy concern, risk, and information control in a smart tourism destination. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 3119-3138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1867215
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Akman, I., & Rehan, M. (2014). Online purchase behaviour among professionals: A socio-demographic perspective for Turkey. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27(1), 689-699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2014.975921
Anić, I. D., Budak, J., Rajh, E., Recher, V., Škare, V., & Škrinjarić, B. (2019). Extended model of online privacy concern: What drives consumers’ decisions? Online Information Review, 43(5), 799-817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2017-0281
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 13-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25148715
Baek, Y. M., Kim, E. M., & Bae, Y. (2014). My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered: Why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 48-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.010
Bansal, G., & Zahedi, F. M. (2015). Trust violation and repair: The information privacy perspective. Decision Support Systems, 71, 62-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.009
Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5375-5393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.563826
Brand, F. S., & Jax, K. (2007). Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: Resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-02029-120123
Bubaš, G., & Hutinski, Z. (2006). Conceptual model, potential predictors and dimensions of affinity for the use of the Internet. . Drustvena istrazivanja, 12(1), 27-44.
Calo, R. M. (2011). The Boundaries of Privacy Harm. Indiana Law Journal, 86(3), 1131-1162.
Cazan, A. M., Cocoradă, E., & Maican, C. I. (2016). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards the computer and the internet with Romanian high-school and university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(Part A), 258-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.001
Das, G., Jain, S. P., Maheswaran, D., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Srinivasan, R. (2021). Pandemics and marketing: Insights, impacts, and research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 835-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00786-y
Dennis, C., Merrilees, B., Jayawardhena, C., & Tiu Wright, L. (2009). E‐consumer behavior. European Journal of Marketing, 43(9/10), 1121-1139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560910976393
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
European Commission. (2023). Eurobarometer 91.1 (ZA7561). Retrieved from GESIS: https://search.gesis.org/research_data/ZA7561?doi=10.4232/1.13317
Ginosar, A., & Ariel, Y. (2017). An analytical framework for online privacy research: What is missing? Information & Management, 54(7), 948-957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.02.004
Graeff, T. R., & Harmon, S. (2002). Collecting and using personal data: Consumers’ awareness and concerns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(4), 302-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363760210433627
Herrman, H., Stewart, D. E., Diaz-Granados, N., Berger, E. L., Jackson, B., & Yuen, T. (2011). What is resilience? The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(5), 258-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/070674371105600504
Hwang, W., Jung, H. S., & Salvendy, G. (2006). Internationalisation of e-commerce: A comparison of online shopping preferences among Korean, Turkish and US populations. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(1), 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290512331335636
Islam, S. (2019). Factors Influencing Customer’s Intention to Adopt Online Shopping: A Holistic Approach. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 9(1), 57-66.
Kaapu, T., & Tiainen, T. (2009). Consumers’ Views on Privacy in E-Commerce. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 1-20.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling: The Guilford Press.
Korzaan, M. L., & Boswell, K. T. (2008). The influence of personality traits and information privacy concerns on behavioral intentions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(4), 15-24.
Kursan Milaković, I. (2021). Purchase experience during the COVID-19 pandemic and social cognitive theory: The relevance of consumer vulnerability, resilience, and adaptability for purchase satisfaction and repurchase. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(6), 1425-1442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12672
Lee, P. M. (2002). Behavioral Model of Online Purchasers in E-Commerce Environment. Electronic Commerce Research, 2, 75-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013340118965
Li, Y. (2011). Empirical studies on online information privacy concerns: Literature review and an integrative framework. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(28), 453-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02828
Liao, C., Liu, C. C., & Chen, K. (2011). Examining the impact of privacy, trust and risk perceptions beyond monetary transactions: An integrated model. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(6), 702-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.07.003
Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed. ed.): Pearson Education.
Lwin, M., Wirtz, J., & Williams, J. D. (2007). Consumer Online Privacy Concerns and Responses: A Power–Responsibility Equilibrium Perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 572-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-006-0003-3
Malhotra, N., Kim, S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032
Martin-Breen, P., & Anderies, J. M. (2011). Resilience: A Literature Review: Bellagio Initiative. IDS.
Miyazaki, A., & Fernandez, A. (2001). Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 27-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00101.x
Oliveira, M. G., & Toaldo, A. M. M. (2015). New times, new strategies: Proposal for an additional dimension to the 4 P’s for e-commerce dot-com.com. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12(1), 107-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752015000100006
Pavlou, A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25148720
Petronio, S. (1991). Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples. Communication Theory, 1(4), 311-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00023.x
Popping, R. (2015). Analyzing open-ended questions by means of text analysis procedures. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique, 128(1), 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0759106315597389
Rajh, E., Škrinjarić, B., & Budak, J. (2021). Otpornost potrošača na narušavanje online privatnosti: Testiranje mjerne ljestvice. Ekonomska misao i praksa, 30(2), 527-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.17818/EMIP/2021/2.11
Reed, T. V. (2014). Digitized Lives: Culture, Power and Social Change in the Internet Era (1st Edition ed.). New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203374672
Rew, D., & Minor, M. (2018). Consumer resilience and consumer attitude towards traumatic events. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 17(4), 319-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1362/147539218X15445233217832
Sharif, M. S., Shao, B., Xiao, F., & Saif, M. K. (2014). The impact of psychological factors on consumers trust in adoption of m-commerce. International Business Research, 7(5), 148-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v7n5p148
Škrinjarić, B., Budak, J., & Rajh, E. (2019). Perceived quality of privacy protection regulations and online privacy concern. Economic research. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 982-1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1585272
Škrinjarić, B., Budak, J., & Žokalj, M. (2018). The effect of personality traits on online privacy concern. Ekonomski Pregled, 69(2), 106-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.32910/ep.69.2.2
Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). In-formation Privacy: Measuring, Individuals’ Concerns about Organisational Practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 167-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249477
Smith, J. H., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 989-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41409970
Soopramanien, D. (2011). Conflicting attitudes and skepticism towards online shopping: The role of experience. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(3), 338-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00945.x
Swinyard, W. R., & Smith, S. M. (2003). Why People (Don’t) Shop Online: A Lifestyle Study of the Internet Consumers. Psychology and Marketing, 20(7), 567-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.10087
Vears, D. F., & Gillam, L. (2022). Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal, 23(1), 111–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v23i1.544
Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J. H., & Hart, P. (2008). Examining the Formation of Individual's Privacy Concerns: Toward an Integrative View. Paper presented at the ICIS 2008 Proceedings, Paris.
Xu, H., Luo, X. R., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2011). The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 42-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.017
Yoon, C. (2011). Theory of Planned Behavior and Ethics Theory in Digital Piracy: An Integrated Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 405-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0687-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jelena Budak, Edo Rajh, Bruno Škrinjarić

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.