The Cultural Practices that Influence on the Entrepreneurial Activity: An Empirical Study from the Globe Project Cultural Dimensions
Keywords:culture, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial activity, cultural dimensions, GLOBE project, developing country
There are few empirical studies focused on the culture, as one of the informal factors that influences business development in a region. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the perception of a society about its cultural practices based on cultural dimensions that are related to entrepreneurial activity. Through literature review, five cultural dimensions that would be closely related to entrepreneurship were identified, which has been corroborated in previous empirical studies. For this research, the city of Medellin (located in Colombia, developing country), which has been characterized by its high rate of business activity at the national level, is taken as context for the fieldwork. The findings show that the society under study perceives that its regional culture is characterized by a high level of assertiveness, hence its competitive nature and propensity to take risks, to boost the entrepreneurial activity.JEL Codes - M10; M13; M14
Alon, I., Lerner, M., and Shoham, A., 2016. Cross-national cultural values and nascent entrepreneurship: Factual versus normative values. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 16(3), 321-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470595816674744
Archer, M. S., 1996. Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557668
Ardichvili, A., and Gasparishvili, A., 2003. Russian and Georgian entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs: A study of value differences. Organization Studies, 24(1), 29-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001679
Autio, E., Pathak, S., and Wennberg, K., 2013. Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4), 334-362.
Busenitz, L. W., and Lau, C. M., 1996. A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(4), 25-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104225879602000403
Castillo-Palacio, M., Batista-Canino, R. M., and Zuniga-Collazos, A., 2017. The relationship between culture and entrepreneurship: From cultural dimensions of GLOBE project. Espacios, 38(34), 12.
Den Hartog, D. N., 2004. Assertiveness. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman and V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (pp. 395-396): Sage.
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor-GEM Colombia, 2014. Dinámica Empresarial Colombiana. https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=50496.
Grilo, I., and Thurik, R., 2005. Latent and actual entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some recent developments. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(4), 441-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-005-4772-9
Gurel, E., Altinay, L., and Daniele, R., 2010. Tourism student's entrepreneurial intentions. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3), 646-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.12.003
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. W., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C., 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis (4th ed. ed.): Prentice Hall.
Hayton, J. C., George, G., and Zahra, S. A., 2002. National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 33-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104225870202600403
Hofstede, G., 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values: Sage.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., and Gupta, V., 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies. California: Sage Publications.
House, R. J., and Javidan, M., 2004. Overview of GLOBE. In R. J. House, R. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman and V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (pp. 9-26): Sage.
House, R. J., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., and Dorfman, P., 2002. Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 3-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00069-4
House, R. J., Quigley, N. R., and De Luque, M. S., 2010. Insights from Project GLOBE Extending global advertising research through a contemporary framework. International Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 111-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.2501/S0265048709201051
Javidan, M., Dorfman, R. W., Sully de Luque, M. F., and House, R. J., 2006. In the eye of the beholder: Cross-cultural lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 67-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.19873410
Kastanakis, M. N., and Voyer, B. G., 2014. The effect of culture on perception and cognition: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 425-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.028
Klapper, L., Leaven, L., and Rajan, R., 2006. Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 591-629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.006
Kluckhohn, F. R., and Strodtbeck, F. L., 1961. Variations in value orientations: Row, Peterson and Company.
Kottak, C. P., 2007. Antropología cultural. España: Editorial McGraw Hill Interamericana SA.
Li, L., 2007. A review of entrepreneurship research published in the hospitality and tourism management journals. Tourism Management, 29(5), 1013-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.003
Lim, D. S. K., Morse, E. A., Mitchell, R. K., and Seawright, K. K., 2010. Institutional environment and entrepreneurial cognitions: A comparative business systems perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 491-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00384.x
Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S., 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
McGrath, R. G., Macmillan, I. C., Yang, E. A., and Tsai, W., 1992. Does culture endure, or is it malleable? Issues for entrepreneurial economic development. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(6), 441-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90019-N
Mitchell, R. K., Smith, B., Seawright, K. W., and Morse, E. A., 2000. Cross-cultural cognitions and the venture creation decision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 974-993. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/1556422
Mitchell, R. K., Smith, J. B., Morse, E. A., Seawright, K. W., Peredo, A. M., and McKenzie, B., 2002. Are Entrepreneurial Cognitions Universal? Assessing Entrepreneurial Cognitions across Cultures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 9-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104225870202600402
Mueller, S., and Thomas, A., 2001. Culture and Entrepreneurial Potential: A Nine Country Study of Locus of Control and Innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 51-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00039-7
Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I., 1994. Psychometric Theory: MacGraw- Hill.
Ogliastri, E., 1998. Culture and organizational leadership in Colombia. Organization Science, 14(6), 686-706.
Ogliastri, E., 2008. Colombia: The human relations side of enterprise. In J. S. Chhokar, F. C. Brodbeck and R. J. House (Eds.), Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies (pp. 689-721). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Ogliastri, E., McMillen, C., Altschul, C., Arias, M. E., Davila, C., Dorfman, P., . . . Martinez, S., 1999. Cultura y liderazgo organizacional en 10 paises de America Latina. El estudio Globe. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración-ARLA, 1(22), 28-57.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., and Kemmelmeier, M., 2002. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
Ozgen, E., 2012. The effect of the national culture on female entrepreneurial activities in emerging countries: An application of the GLOBE Project cultural dimensions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 16(Special Issue), 69-92.
Pinillos, M. J., and Reyes, L., 2011. Relationship between individualist-collectivist culture and entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 23-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9230-6
Reynolds, P. D., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., Cox, L. W., and Hay, M., 2002. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Kauffman Foundation.
Saxe, R., and Weitz, B. A., 1982. The SOCO Scale: A Measure of the Customer Orientation of Salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(3), 343-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151568
Shane, S., and Venkataraman, S., 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
Steers, R. M., Sanchez-Runde, C. J., and Nardon, L., 2010. Management Across cultures: Challenges and Strategies: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810510
Thornton, P. H., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., and Urbano, D., 2011. Social-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 105-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242610391930
Triandis, H. C., 1989. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E., 1999. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience: MIT Press.
Zhao, X., Li, H., and Rauch, A., 2012. Cross-Country Differences in Entrepreneurial Activity: The Role of Cultural Practice and National Wealth. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 6(4), 447-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.3868/s070-001-012-0021-0
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 SCIENTIFIC ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.