Impact of Board Gender Diversity on Sustainable Development: Evidence from European Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2026-0025Keywords:
board gender diversity, gender equality, ESG, sustainable development.Abstract
This study investigates the link between board gender diversity and corporate sustainability performance, and how national cultural values influence this relationship in European countries. Based on Upper Echelons Theory, Stakeholder Theory, and Institutional perspectives, we posit that gender diversity on boards promotes a greater focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals for firms due to enhanced ethical monitoring, stakeholder engagement, and legitimacy, while we expect the impact of gender-diverse boards to be contingent on the surrounding cultural context. We employ a dynamic panel dataset of 8,197 firm–year observations corresponding to 818 listed companies from 31 European countries during the period 2014–2024, and we utilize the Difference Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator to control for unobserved heterogeneity, persistence in ESG performance, and endogeneity. We find a strong positive relationship between board gender diversity and corporate sustainability performance, which is moderated by national cultural values in Europe.
References
Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1027–1047. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data (6th ed. ed.): Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
d'Hoop-Azar, A., Martens, K., Papolis, P., & Sancho, E. (2017). Gender parity on boards around the world. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
Dawson, J., Kersley, R., & Natella, S. (2016). The CS gender 3000: The reward for change: Credit Suisse Research Institute.
Deloitte. (2022). Women in the boardroom: A global perspective (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone1/southeast-asia/en/docs/services/risk-advisory/2025/sea-risk-women-in-the-boardroom-seventh-edition.pdf
Deloitte. (2024). Women in the boardroom. A global perspective -8th edi. Retrieved from https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-zone1/nz/en/docs/services/risk-advisory/2024/2024-report-women-in-the-boardroom-eighth-edition.pdf
Domínguez, M. B. (2018). Del cristal al acero: nuevas barreras para nuevos tiempos. Revista de Trabajo y Seguridad Social, Comentarios, casos prácticos(429), 223–262.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
EIGE. (2023). Gender Statistics Database. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/dgs/indicator/wmidm_bus_bus__wmid_comp_compbm
European Commission. (2011). Green Paper - The EU corporate governance framework. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52011DC0164
European Commission. (2020). A Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/redirection/document/68222
European Commission. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2381 on improving the gender balance among directors of listed companies: Official Journal of the European Union.
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
Fernández-Méndez, C., Arrondo-García, R., & Fonseca-Díaz, A. R. (2025). Sustainability practices, board’s gender diversity and quota regulations in European markets. Review of Managerial Science, 19, 1–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00846-5
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach: Pitman.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
10.2307/258434
Harjoto, M., Laksmana, I., & Lee, R. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 641–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2343-0
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2007). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 33(3), 434–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206306298507
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed. ed.): Sage Publications.
Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass”? Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation: Basic Books.
Kramer, V. W., Konrad, A. M., Erkut, S., & Hooper, M. J. (2007). Critical Mass on Corporate Boards: Why Three or More Women Enhance Governance. 31(2), 19–22.
Krüger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2021). The importance of gender diversity in corporate boards: Evidence from cultural differences. Review of Financial Studies, 34(2), 726–761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa047
Lee, L. E., Marshall, R., Rallis, D., & Moscardi, M. (2015). Women on boards: Global trends in gender diversity on corporate boards. MSCI Research Insights, 1–31.
Li, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2012). Formal institutions, culture, and venture capital activity: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 95–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.06.003
Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48036912
Li, Y., & Zeng, S. (2019). Cultural values and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 111–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.294
LSEG. (2023). ESG Scores Methodology. Refinitiv. Retrieved from https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics
Martínez-García, I., Sacristán-Navarro, M., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2023). Soft gender diversity regulations for boards of directors: The moderating role of firm ownership and control structure. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 52(1), 93–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2022.2066346
Martínez García, I. (2023). Cuotas de género en los consejos de administración: una perspectiva internacional. Revista Iberoamericana de Mercados de Valores, 69.
Martínez García, I., & Gómez Ansón, S. (2023). Women on Corporate Boards in Europe: milestones and challenges. Gender Diversity: Past, Present and Future Perspectives: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Martínez García, I., & Gómez Díaz, F. (2021). Hitos y retos de la diversidad de género en los consejos de administración en España. Cuadernos de Información Económica, 282.
Martínez García, I., Sacristán Navarro, M., & Gómez Ansón, S. (2020). Diversidad de género en los consejos de administración: El efecto de la normativa en la presencia de mujeres en las empresas españolas cotizadas. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Comunicación aDResearch ESIC, 22(22). http://dx.doi.org/10.7263/adresic-022-03
Martínez, M. D. C. V., Martín-Cervantes, P. A., & del Mar Miralles-Quirós, M. (2022). Sustainable development and the limits of gender policies on corporate boards in Europe. A comparative analysis between developed and emerging markets. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(1), 100168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100168
Mejía, D. R., & Ribera, I. L. (2003). Equidad de género, medio ambiente y políticas públicas: El caso de México y la Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Revista de estudios de género. La Ventana, 2(17), 43–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.32870/lv.v2i17.644
Nadeem, M. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from an emerging economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3352–3363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2578
Page, A., Sealy, R., Parker, A., & Hauser, O. (2024). Regulation and the trickle-down effect of women in leadership roles. The Leadership Quarterly, 35(5), 101721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101721
Pons Carmena, M. (2024). La presencia de mujeres en los consejos de administración y puestos directivos de las empresas: De la ley orgánica de igualdad (2007) al-proyecto-de ley orgánica de paridad. Lan harremanak, 51.
Reyes-Bastidas, C., & Briano-Turrent, G. C. (2018). Las mujeres en posiciones de liderazgo y la sustentabilidad empresarial: Evidencia en empresas cotizadas de Colombia y Chile. 34(148), 385–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2018.149.2877
Ringov, D., & Zollo, M. (2007). Corporate responsibility from a socio-institutional perspective: The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 15(3), 161–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00554.x
Roodman, D. (2009a). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106
Roodman, D. (2009b). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x
Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–577. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4278989
10.2307/258135
United Nations. (2024). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adina Dornean, Carmen María HERNÁNDEZ NICOLÁS, Antonio MINGUEZ VERA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
This work is licenced under a 
