CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FOR A.S.E. LISTED FIRMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/saeb-2016-0107Keywords:
Corporate governance, Greek Code of corporate governance, Sarbanes - Oxley Act, Agency Theory, Rating SystemAbstract
The present paper focuses on the level of compliance and application of corporate governance from the corporations listed in the Athens Stock Exchange (A.S.E.) and attempts to highlight improvements from the adoption of best practices suggested by corporate governance recent trends worldwide. In order for the research to be conducted, a series of qualitative and quantitative variables were used, as derived from the financial statements of 162 public companies. A more extensive analysis regarding the level of compliance with corporate governance was conducted in 25 companies with the highest and 25 corporations with the lowest score, whose classification in these positions was the result of a rating system that was created for this purpose.
JEL Codes - G10, G23, G34References
Aghimien, P., 2010. The impact of Sarbanes Oxley Act on International Accounting and Multinational Enterprises. International Journal of Business, Accounting, & Finance, 4(2), 102-117.
Arnold, B., and De Lange, P., 2004. Enron: an examination of agency problems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(6-7), 751-765. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.08.005
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., and Ye, Z. S., 2011. Corporate Governance Research in Accounting and Auditing: Insights, Practice Implications, and Future Research Directions. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 1-31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10112
Chavan, M., 2009. The balanced scorecard: a new challenge. Journal of Management Development, 28(5), 393-406. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02621710910955930
Coates, J. C., 2007. The goals and promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 91-116. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.1.91
Garneau, V., and Shahid, A., 2009. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: A redundant regulation for the banking industry. Journal of Banking Regulation, 10, 285-299. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2009.8
Gounaridi, P., 2011. Indicators Corporate Governance –Model Measurement and Assessment "ScoreCard" of Corporate Governance in Greek Listed ASE Companies. Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences.
Gutierrez, I., and Surroca, J., 2014. Revisiting corporate governance through the lens of the Spanish evidence. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(4), 989-1017. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9250-5
Huse, M., 2007. Boards, Governance and Value Creation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kang, L. S., and Payal, 2012. Women on Corporate Boards: A Literature Review. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(1), 33-49.
Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P., 1992. The Balanced Scorecard:Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
Kokla, E., 2010. Implement measurement systems and improving efficiency in the public sector. National Technical University of Athens.
Lobo, J. G., and Zhou, J., 2010. Changes in Discretionary Financial Reporting Behavior Following the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 25(1), 1-26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148558X1002500101
Mallin, C. A., 2007. Corporate Governance. New York: Oxford University Press
Nørreklit, H., Nørreklit, L., Mitchell, F., and Bjørnenak, T., 2012. The rise of the balanced scorecard! Relevance regained? Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 8(4), 490-510. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/18325911211273491
Oakley, J. G., 2000. Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 321-334. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006226129868
Papadopoulou, L., 2012. The effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard (Balanced Performance Card) Internal Auditing. University of Macedonia
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 SCIENTIFIC ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.