Listening at Scale: A Replicable, Low-Cost Pipeline for Collecting and Analyzing Google Business Reviews with SerpApi and VADER

Authors

  • Marian Pompiliu Cristescu Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania
  • Dumitru Alexandru Mara Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania
  • Ana-Maria Constantinescu Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu image/svg+xml
  • Ioana Petrea Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania
  • Ana Englitera Visan Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2026-0027

Keywords:

sentiment analysis, VADER, SerpApi, Google Maps review, SMEs

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises increasingly rely on public review platforms as signals of quality, reputation, and customer experience, yet many owners still lack a practical way to process multilingual review text at regular intervals. This study develops a low-cost and reproducible workflow for collecting Google Business reviews, filtering translated English content, and summarizing sentiment with open analytical tools. The pipeline uses SerpApi to retrieve recent reviews for a known Google Maps place identifier and VADER to classify translated review text into positive, neutral, and negative sentiment. The procedure is demonstrated on 200 Google reviews for an auto-rental location, Klass Wagen Sibiu. Results indicate a strongly positive corpus, with 85% positive, 4% neutral, and 11% negative reviews, a mean VADER compound score of 0.538, and a median of 0.733. The association between VADER scores and star ratings is high, r = 0.83, but it is interpreted as convergent descriptive evidence rather than classification accuracy. The study contributes an applied decision-support blueprint that connects online-review analytics, sentiment analysis, and SME monitoring practice. Its limits remain important: review data are self-selected, platform access is constrained, automatic translation can alter sentiment, and lexicon-based models may miss sarcasm or domain-specific wording.

 

References

Almansour, A., Alotaibi, R., & Alharbi, H. (2022). Text-rating review discrepancy (TRRD): An integrative review and implications for research. 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00114-y

Anderson, M., & Magruder, J. (2012). Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Economic Journal (London), 122(563), 957–989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02512.x

Balahur, A., & Turchi, M. (2014). Comparative experiments using supervised learning and machine translation for multilingual sentiment analysis. Computer Speech & Language, 28(1), 56–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2013.03.004

Bordoloi, M., & Biswas, S. K. (2023). Sentiment analysis: A survey on design framework, applications and future scopes. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(1), 12505–12560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10442-2

Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345

Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019, June). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Google Maps Platform. (2025). Place Details.

Harris, J. (2011). Word clouds considered harmful. Nieman Lab. Retrieved from https://www.niemanlab.org/2011/10/word-clouds-considered-harmful/

Hutto, C. J., & Gilbert, E. (2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0154

Luca, M. (2016). Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com (Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 12-016). Retrieved from Boston, MA: https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/12-016_a7e4a5a2-03f9-490d-b093-8f951238dba2.pdf

Mohammad, S. M., Salameh, M., & Kiritchenko, S. (2016). How translation alters sentiment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 55, 95–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1613/jair.4787

Mueller, A. wordcloud: A little word cloud generator in Python: wordcloud. Retrieved from https://amueller.github.io/word_cloud/

Nguyen, H. L., & Dao, T. H. (2024). Text mining: Sentiment analysis of reviews on TripAdvisor for Vietnam’s Michelin-starred and selected restaurants in the 2023 Michelin Guide. 11(2), 131–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.33851/JMIS.2024.11.2.131

Schoenmueller, V., Netzer, O., & Stahl, F. (2020). The polarity of online reviews: Prevalence, drivers and implications. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 57(5), 853–877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022243720941832

SerpApi. Google Maps Reviews API. SerpApi. Retrieved from https://serpapi.com/google-maps-reviews-api

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., . . . Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is All you Need. Paper presented at the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf

Wirth, R., & Hipp, J. (2000). CRISP-DM: Towards a standard process model for data mining. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. https://www.cs.unibo.it/~danilo.montesi/CBD/Beatriz/10.1.1.198.5133.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-08-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Listening at Scale: A Replicable, Low-Cost Pipeline for Collecting and Analyzing Google Business Reviews with SerpApi and VADER. (2026). Scientific Annals of Economics and Business. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2026-0027

Most read articles by the same author(s)