Listening at Scale: A Replicable, Low-Cost Pipeline for Collecting and Analyzing Google Business Reviews with SerpApi and VADER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2026-0027Keywords:
sentiment analysis, VADER, SerpApi, Google Maps review, SMEsAbstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises increasingly rely on public review platforms as signals of quality, reputation, and customer experience, yet many owners still lack a practical way to process multilingual review text at regular intervals. This study develops a low-cost and reproducible workflow for collecting Google Business reviews, filtering translated English content, and summarizing sentiment with open analytical tools. The pipeline uses SerpApi to retrieve recent reviews for a known Google Maps place identifier and VADER to classify translated review text into positive, neutral, and negative sentiment. The procedure is demonstrated on 200 Google reviews for an auto-rental location, Klass Wagen Sibiu. Results indicate a strongly positive corpus, with 85% positive, 4% neutral, and 11% negative reviews, a mean VADER compound score of 0.538, and a median of 0.733. The association between VADER scores and star ratings is high, r = 0.83, but it is interpreted as convergent descriptive evidence rather than classification accuracy. The study contributes an applied decision-support blueprint that connects online-review analytics, sentiment analysis, and SME monitoring practice. Its limits remain important: review data are self-selected, platform access is constrained, automatic translation can alter sentiment, and lexicon-based models may miss sarcasm or domain-specific wording.
References
Almansour, A., Alotaibi, R., & Alharbi, H. (2022). Text-rating review discrepancy (TRRD): An integrative review and implications for research. 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00114-y
Anderson, M., & Magruder, J. (2012). Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Economic Journal (London), 122(563), 957–989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02512.x
Balahur, A., & Turchi, M. (2014). Comparative experiments using supervised learning and machine translation for multilingual sentiment analysis. Computer Speech & Language, 28(1), 56–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2013.03.004
Bordoloi, M., & Biswas, S. K. (2023). Sentiment analysis: A survey on design framework, applications and future scopes. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(1), 12505–12560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10442-2
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019, June). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Google Maps Platform. (2025). Place Details.
Harris, J. (2011). Word clouds considered harmful. Nieman Lab. Retrieved from https://www.niemanlab.org/2011/10/word-clouds-considered-harmful/
Hutto, C. J., & Gilbert, E. (2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0154
Luca, M. (2016). Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com (Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 12-016). Retrieved from Boston, MA: https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/12-016_a7e4a5a2-03f9-490d-b093-8f951238dba2.pdf
Mohammad, S. M., Salameh, M., & Kiritchenko, S. (2016). How translation alters sentiment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 55, 95–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1613/jair.4787
Mueller, A. wordcloud: A little word cloud generator in Python: wordcloud. Retrieved from https://amueller.github.io/word_cloud/
Nguyen, H. L., & Dao, T. H. (2024). Text mining: Sentiment analysis of reviews on TripAdvisor for Vietnam’s Michelin-starred and selected restaurants in the 2023 Michelin Guide. 11(2), 131–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.33851/JMIS.2024.11.2.131
Schoenmueller, V., Netzer, O., & Stahl, F. (2020). The polarity of online reviews: Prevalence, drivers and implications. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 57(5), 853–877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022243720941832
SerpApi. Google Maps Reviews API. SerpApi. Retrieved from https://serpapi.com/google-maps-reviews-api
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., . . . Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is All you Need. Paper presented at the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf
Wirth, R., & Hipp, J. (2000). CRISP-DM: Towards a standard process model for data mining. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. https://www.cs.unibo.it/~danilo.montesi/CBD/Beatriz/10.1.1.198.5133.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marian Pompiliu Cristescu, Dumitru Alexandru Mara, Ana-Maria Constantinescu, Ioana Petrea, Ana Englitera Visan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.




