Flexicurity in the EU28 Countries: A Multiyear Composite Indicator Proposal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2024-0006Keywords:
flexicurity, EU policy, labor markets, composite indicatorsAbstract
This study computes a flexicurity index for the EU28 countries for 2001-2019 following the European Commission’s four components of flexicurity model. The index allows the ex-post assessment of flexicurity efforts and efficiency. Following the computation of the index, we compare its values against the theoretical flexicurity typologies and against other empirical flexicurity groupings to assess their (dis)similarities. Even though Northern and Western countries generally have higher flexicurity scores than Southern and Eastern states, the study shows some countries deviate from their theoretical performance. Thus, some of the Continental and Mediterranean countries have flexicurity values like those of the Nordic group. Moreover, the flexicurity regimes are not static as the theoretical typology suggests: while Denmark and France are always in the top performers’ group, other countries change their performance throughout the 2001-2019 period. The flexicurity index correlates highly with empirical country groupings in the literature. The highest correlation is with country groupings using the European Commission’s four components of flexicurity model, followed by the Golden Danish Triangle, and lastly, the Wilthagen and Tros’ flexicurity matrix. In the end, we compare EU countries’ performance in the flexicurity index scores with their performance in selected employment and unemployment rates, labor productivity, and poverty rates. Results suggest that higher flexicurity performance correlates generally with better labor market and social outcomes, the highest correlations being in the case of labor productivity rates.
References
Auer, P. (2010). What’s in a Name? The Rise (and Fall?) of Flexicurity. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(3), 371-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185610365646
Auer, P., & Chatani, K. (2011). Flexicurity: still going strong or a victim of the crisis? Research handbook on the future of work and employment relations (pp. 253-278): Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9780857936363.00022
Becker, W., Benavente, D., Dominguez-Torreiro, M., Moura, C., Neves, A., Saisana, M., & Vertesy, D. (2019). COIN Tool: User Guide. Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/523877
Bekker, S. (2018). Flexicurity in the European Semester: Still a relevant policy concept? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 175-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363272
Calmfors, L. (2007). Flexicurity: an answer or a question? Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (SIEPS).
Chung, H. (2012). Measuring Flexicurity: Precautionary Notes, a New Framework, and an Empirical Example. Social Indicators Research, 106(1), 153-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9800-2
De Pedraza Garcia, P., Alvarez Diaz, M., & Dominguez Torreiro, M. (2018). Revamping the flexicurity analytical framework: conceptual and empirical analysis of the links between flexicurity policies and social outcomes. Retrieved from https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/revamping-flexicurity-analytical-framework-conceptual-empirical-analysis-links-between_en
Dominguez-Torreiro, M., & Casubolo, C. (2017). Exploratory analysis of flexicurity dimensions across EU countries: a statistical assessment and consensus clustering approach. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7f382479-fb3a-11e7-b8f5-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
EMCO. (2009). Monitoring and analysis of Flexicurity policies. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/social/search.jsp?mainCat=&subCat=&year=&country=&advSearchKey=Monitoring+and+analysis+of+Flexicurity+policies+&mode=advancedSubmit&langId=en&searchType=&search=Search
European Commission. (2007). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Youth Opportunities Initiative Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM%3A2007%3A0359%3AFIN%3AEN%3APDF
European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010DC2020
Ferent-Pipas, M., & Lazar, D. (2023). Flexicurity and self-perceived work–life balance in the EU27: A repeated cross-sectional multilevel analysis. Economic and Industrial Democracy, Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143831X231213024
GHK, I. (2013). Evaluation of flexicurity 2007-2010: Final Report. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/social/search.jsp?advSearchKey=Evaluation+of+flexicurity+2007-2010%3A+Final+Report&mode=advancedSubmit&langId=en
Hastings, T., & Heyes, J. (2018). Farewell to flexicurity? Austerity and labour policies in the European Union. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 39(3), 458-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143831X16633756
Madsen, P. K. (2004). The Danish model of ‘flexicurity’: experiences and lessons. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 10(2), 187-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/102425890401000205
Madsen, P. K., Molina, O., Møller, J., & Lozano, M. (2013). Labour market transitions of young workers in Nordic and southern European countries: The role of flexicurity. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 19(3), 325-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1024258913495348
Manca, A. R., Governatori, M., & Mascherini, M. (2010). Towards a set of composite indicators on flexicurity: A comprehensive approach. Retrieved from Luxembourg: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC58069
Muffels, R., & Luijkx, R. (2008). Labour market mobility and employment security of male employees in Europe: ‘trade-off’ or ‘flexicurity’? Work, Employment and Society, 22(2), 221-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0950017008089102
Muffels, R., & Wilthagen, A. C. (2013). Flexicurity: A New Paradigm for the Analysis of Labor Markets and Policies Challenging the Trade-Off Between Flexibility and Security. Sociology Compass, 7(2), 111-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12014
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantol, a. S., Hoffmann, A., & Giovannini, E. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD.
Nikulin, D., & Gawrycka, M. (2021). Implementation of the Concept of Flexicurity in the Selected Countries of Central Eastern Europe. Ekonomista. Ekonomista, 1, 118-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.52335/dvqigjykfff4
Noja, G. G. (2018). Flexicurity models and productivity interference in C.E.E. countries: A new approach based on cluster and spatial analysis. Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 31(1), 1111-1136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1456356
Saisana, M., & Saltelli, A. (2006). Sensitive issues in the development of composite indicators for policy-making. In Simulation in Industry and Services Conference.
Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. ournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 168(2), 307-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x
Saltelli, A., D’Hombres, B., Jesinghaus, J., Manca, A., Mascherini, M., Nardo, M., & Saisana, M. (2011). Indicators for European Union Policies. Business as Usual? Social Indicators Research, 102(2), 197-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9678-4
Wilthagen, T., & Tros, F. (2004). The concept of ‘flexicurity’: A new approach to regulating employment and labour markets. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 10(2), 166-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/102425890401000204.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Marina Ferent-Pipas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.