The Economic Impact of the LEADER Program in the Rural Communities of Romania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2023-0026Keywords:
LEADER funds, rural communities, economic impact, socio-economic development, Difference in Differences method.Abstract
The sustainable development of rural areas is one of the European Union’s objectives. LEADER program contributes to its fulfillment by offering financial support to disadvantaged rural areas. The purpose of this paper is to assess the LEADER program’s economic impact in the Romanian rural communities. Econometric methods of impact assessment were used to analyze the evolution of economic indicators in the beneficiary communities. Propensity Score Matching and Difference in Differences were the methods applied in order to meet the objectives of the paper: analysis of the spatial distribution of projects submitted and funds allocated to LAGs (1), and of the economic evolution of LAG and non-LAG communities, before and after LEADER funding (2). The results indicate a stronger economic growth for the beneficiary rural communities, confirming in all cases the initial hypothesis. LEADER seems to have acted in these directions: the creation of new jobs and increasing the local businesses performance. However, the contribution made was minimal and insignificant. Conclusions of the study highlight that the contribution of the LEADER program to the economic development of rural communities can be at most one of supporting the current level of development, but not of reaching a much higher level. LEADER can be considered, from a quantitative point of view, only an instrument with a positive effect on rural areas, but not an instrument of impact. This is because LEADER did not bring significant changes and didn’t ensure that critical mass that could trigger the economic development of rural communities.
References
Alonso, G. C., & Masot, A. N. (2020). Rural Space Governance in Extremadura (SW Spain). Analysis of the Leader Approach. European Countryside, 12(4), 448-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/euco-2020-0024
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3
Badea, A., Fîntîneru, A., & Baciu, G. A. (2015). The rural development program in Romania and the place of LEADER program within its Agrarian Economy And Rural Development Realities And Perspectives for Romania – the (6th ed. ed., pp. 368-372): The Research Insitute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development.
Biczkowski, M. (2020). LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: The case of Poland. Miscellanea Geographica, 24(4), 232-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0041
Bran, F., Alpopi, C., & Burlacu, S. (2018). Territorial Development - Disparities between the Developed and the least Developed Areas of Romania. In C. Nătase (Ed.), Strategies and Development Policies of Territories. International, Country Region, City Location Challenges (pp. 146-155): Lumen. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/lumproc.69
Bryson, A., Dorsett, R., & Purdon, S. (2002). The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labour market policies: Dept. of Work and Pensions.
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
Cañete, J. A., Navarro, F., & Cejudo, E. (2018). Territorially unequal rural development: The cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain). European Planning Studies, 26(4), 726-744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118
Chivu, L., Andrei, J. V., Zaharia, M., & Gogonea, R. M. (2020). A regional agricultural efficiency convergence assessment in Romania – Appraising differences and understanding potentials. Land Use Policy, 99, 104838. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104838
Chmieliński, P., Faccilongo, N., Fiore, M., & La Sala, P. (2018). Design and implementation of the Local Development Strategy: A case study of Polish and Italian Local Action Groups in 2007-2013. Studies in Agricultural Economics (Budapest), 120(1), 25-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1726
Dachin, A. (2008). Rural development – a basic condition for narrowing regional disparities in Romania. Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 2(2), 106-117.
Dimick, J. B., & Ryan, A. M. (2014). Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: The difference-in-differences approach. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(22), 2401-2402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.16153
Emas, R. (2015). The Concept of Sustainable Development Definition and Defining Principles Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5839GSDR%202015_SD_concept_definiton_rev.pdf
Esparcia Perez, J. (2000). The leader Programme and the Rise of Rural Development in Spain. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 200-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00142
Feldman, M., Hadjimichael, T., Lanahan, L., & Kemeny, T. (2016). The logic of economic development: A definition and model for investment. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 34(1), 5-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614653
Gertler, P., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L., & Vermeersch, C. (2011). Impact Evaluation in Practice: The World Bank.
Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
Goschin, Z., Constantin, D., Roman, M., & Ileanu, B. (2008). The current state and dynamics of regional disparities in Romania. Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 2(2), 80-105.
Hammer, J., & Pivo, G. (2017). The Triple Bottom Line and Sustainable Economic Development Theory and Practice. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(1), 25-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891242416674808
Jalalian, H., Naimabadi, N., & Brunori, G. L. (2021). An Overview on Success of the LEADER Approach in European Countries. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 10(1), 63-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.22067/JRRP.V10I1.88362
Kim, T. H., & Yang, S. R. (2016). Construction of The Rural Development Index: The Case Of Vietnam. Journal of Rural Development, 39, 113-142.
Krievina, A., Leimane, I., & Melece, L. (2015). Analysis of economic aspects of LEADER projects in Latvia. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference “Economic Science for Rural Development.
Mihai, C., Ulman, S. R., & David, M. (2019). New Assessment of Development Status among the People Living in Rural Areas: An Alternative Approach for Rural Vitality. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 66(2), 167-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2019-0013
Mitrică, B., Şerban, P., Mocanu, I., Grigorescu, I., Damian, N., & Dumitraşcu, M. (2020). Social Development and Regional Disparities in the Rural Areas of Romania: Focus on the Social Disadvantaged Areas. Social Indicators Research, 152(1), 67-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02415-7
Nafziger, W. (2012). What Is Economic Development? In E. W. Nafziger (Ed.), Economic Development (5 ed., pp. 14-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028295.003
Neto, P., Santos, A., & Serrano, M. M. (2014). Public policies supporting local networks for entrepreneurship and innovation: Effectiveness and added value analysis of LEADER program in the Alentejo region of Portugal. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 21(3), 406-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2014.060900
Nițescu, A. (2014). Aspects of rural development in Romania. Annals of the University of Petrosani. Economics, 14(1), 251-258.
Olar, A., & Jitea, M. I. (2021). Counterbalancing the Development Territorial Disparities in the Implementation of the Community-Led Local Development EU Approach in Romania. Land (Basel), 10(9), 970. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land10090970
Onofrei, M., Siriteanu, A.-A., & Doacă, E.-M. (2023). The Impact of Environmental Effects of Sustainable Development on Direct Investments. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 70(SI), 33-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2023-0017
Opria, A. M., Roșu, L., & Iațu, C. (2021). LEADER Program—An Inclusive or Selective Instrument for the Development of Rural Space in Romania? Sustainability (Basel), 13(21), 12187. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su132112187
Pufahl, A., & Weiss, C. R. (2009). Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: Results from propensity score matching. European Review of Agriculture Economics, 36(1), 79-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbp001
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H. C., Bilinski, A., & Poe, J. (2023). What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 2218-2244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008
Ruiz Pulpón, Á. R., & Cañizares Ruiz, M. D. C. (2020). Enhancing the Territorial Heritage of Declining Rural Areas in Spain: Towards Integrating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches. Land (Basel), 9(7), 216. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land9070216
Ryan, A. M., Burgess, J. F., & Dimick, J. B. (2015). Why We Should Not Be Indifferent to Specification Choices for Difference-in-Differences. Health Services Research, 50(4), 1211-1235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12270
Sandu, D. (2011). Social Disparities in the Regional Development and Policies of Romania. International Review of Social Research, 1(1), 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2011-0001
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle: Oxford University Press.
St. Clair, T., & Cook, T. D. (2015). Difference-in-differences methods in public finance. National Tax Journal, 68(2), 319-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.2.04
Staffa, S. J., & Zurakowski, D. (2018). Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 127(4), 1066-1073. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002787
Stoustrup, S. W. (2022). Assessing the Potential of Social Innovation and Local Agenda-Setting within Rural Development Programmes: Insights from Austrian Leader Regions. European Countryside, 14(4), 638-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/euco-2022-0032
Thavaneswaran, A., & Lix, L. (2008). Propensity Score Matching in Observational Studies. Retrieved from https://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/health_sciences/medicine/units/chs/departmental_units/mchp/protocol/media/propensity_score_matching.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1d3Ue2CBTriUn4tqAOuUljLWl5eiEnMNpXKsX1TPsRiJsg3DI_-pnZsLI
Turek Rahoveanu, A., & Turek Rahoveanu, M. M. (2013). Socio-economic development prospects of rural areas in the context of application of LEADER program in Romania. Scientific Papers. Series Management, Economic, Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 13(4), 295-302.
White, H. (2010). A Contribution to Current Debates in Impact Evaluation. Evaluation, 16(2), 153-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356389010361562
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ana-Maria Opria, Lucian Roșu, Corneliu Iațu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.