Input-Output Models and Derived Indicators: A Critical Review

Argyrios D. Kolokontes, Achilleas Kontogeorgos, Efstratios Loizou, Fotios Chatzitheodoridis

Abstract


Input-Output literature can be characterized as complicated and chaotic. The complications concern the nomenclature of concepts for the derived indices from the multipliers’ models, their mathematical expressions and computable applications. The terminologies’ inconsistencies often end up to a deviation between the description for these indices and their actual computation, or/and to a misunderstanding as for their usefulness and outcomes. The aim of the paper is to help the readers to face the weaknesses in the literature. In this way, the paper provide an overview with a critical look to the constructed multipliers’ matrices and their derived indicators from the I-O models, and elaborate the causes for the scrutinized confusions. The paper proposes both terminological and computational adjustments and differentiated approaches for the models and their indices, in order to ameliorate their capabilities and to exploit their peculiarities for the developmental patterns. Alternative interpretative ways and applicable expansions are suggested.



Keywords


Leontief’s and Ghosh’s models; initial effects; linkages’ indices; multipliers; elasticities; size-indicators.

JEL Codes


C18, C31, C67, F43, O21.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acharya, N. S., and Hazari, R. B., 1971. Linkages and Imports: A Comparative Study of India and Pakistan. The Journal of Development Studies, 8(1), 107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220387108421391

Alauddin, M., 1986. Identification of Key Sectors in the Bangladesh Economy: A Linkage Analysis Approach. Applied Economics, 18(4), 421-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036848600000039

Amsden, H. A., 1995. Inductive Theory in Economic Development: A Tribute to Wassily Leontief on his 90th Birthday. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6(3), 279-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0954-349X(95)00017-H

Augusztinovics, M., 1970. Methods of International and Intertemporal Comparison of Structure. In P. A. Carter and A. Brody (Eds.), Contributions to Input-Output Analysis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

Augusztinovics, M., 1995. What Input - Output is About. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6(3), 271-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0954-349X(95)00016-G

Baumol, J. W., and Wolff, N. E., 1994. A Key-Role of Input-Output Analysis in Policy Design. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(1), 93-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(94)90021-3

Bayers, B. W., 1976. Empirical Identification of Key Sectors: Some Further Evidence. Environment & Planning A, 8(2), 231-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a080231

Bekhet, A. H., 2011. Output, Income and Employment Multipliers in Malaysian Economy: Input-Output Approach. International Business Research, 4(1), 208-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v4n1p208

Bekhet, A. H., 2012. Assessing Development Efficiency in Malaysian Economy: Input-Output Approach. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 4(3), 297-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2012.046823

Beverelli, C., Koopman, B. R., Kummritz, V., and Neumueller, S., 2016. Domestic Foundations of Global Value Chains. International Workshop on GVC Development.

Bjerkholt, O., 1995. When Input - Output Analysis Came to Norway. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6(3), 319-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0954-349X(95)00021-E

Cai, J., and Leung, P., 2004. Linkage Measures: A Revisit and a Suggested Alternative. Economic Systems Research, 16(1), 65-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0953531032000164800

Cardenete, M. A., Lima, M. C., and Sancho, F., 2017. A Multiplier Evaluation of Primary Factors Supply-Shocks. Working Paper in History and Economics. Universidad Pablo Olavide. Sevilla.

Cardenete, M. A., and Sancho, F., 2012. The Role of Supply Constraints in Multiplier Analysis. Economic Systems Research, 24(1), 21-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2011.615824

Cella, G., 1984. The Input - Output Measurement of Interindustry Linkages. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 46(1), 73-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1984.mp46001005.x

Chenery, B. H., and Watanabe, T., 1958. International Comparison of the Structure of Production. Econometrica, 26(4), 487-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1907514

Chuenchum, P., Puttanapong, N., Suttinon, P., and Ruangrassamme, P., 2018. Cross-Sectoral Analysis of Water Usage in Thailand Using Input-Output Model. Engineering Journal (New York), 22(6), 93-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.4186/ej.2018.22.6.93

Ciobanu, C., Mattas, K., and Psaltopoulos, D., 2004. Structural Changes in Less Developed Areas: An I-O Framework. Regional Studies, 38(6), 603-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/003434042000240914

Clements, J. B., 1990. On the Decomposition and Normalization of Interindustry Linkages. Economics Letters, 33(4), 337-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(90)90084-E

Clements, J. B., and Rossi, W. J., 1991. Interindustry Linkages and Economic Development: The Case of Brazil Reconsidered. The Developing Economies, 29(2), 166-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1991.tb00205.x

Cuello, A. F., Mansouri, F., and Hewings, D. J. G., 1992. The Identification of Structure at a Sectoral Level: A Reformulation of Hirschman-Rasmussen Key-Sector Indices. Economic Systems Research, 4(4), 285-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09535319200000027

de Mesnard, L., 1990. Biproportional Method for Analyzing Interindustry Dynamics: The Case of France. Economic Systems Research, 2(3), 271-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09535319000000019

de Mesnard, L., 1997. A Biproportional Filter to Compare Technical and Allocation Coefficient Variations. Journal of Regional Science, 37(4), 541-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00069

de Mesnard, L., 2000. Bicausative Matrices to Measure Structural Change: Are They a Good Tool? The Annals of Regional Science, 34(3), 421-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001680000023

de Mesnard, L., 2002a. Consistency of the Supply-Driven Model: A Typological Approach. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Montreal, Canada.

de Mesnard, L., 2002b. Note About the Concept of Net Multiplier. Journal of Regional Science, 42(3), 545-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00271

de Mesnard, L., 2004. Understanding the Shortcomings of Commodity-Based Technology in Input-Output Models: An Economic Circuit Approach. Journal of Regional Science, 44(1), 125-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1085-9489.2004.00330.x

de Mesnard, L., 2007a. A Critical Comment on Oosterhaven-Stelder Net Multipliers. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(2), 249-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0093-3

de Mesnard, L., 2007b. Reply to Oosterhaven: The Net Multiplier is a New Key Sector Indicator. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(2), 285-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0095-1

de Mesnard, L., 2009. Is the Ghosh Model Interesting? Journal of Regional Science, 49(2), 361-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00593.x

Diamond, J., 1975. Inter-industry Indicators of Employment Potential. Applied Economics, 7(4), 265-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036847500000028

Dietzenbacher, E., 1997. In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: A Reinterpretation as a Price Model. Journal of Regional Science, 37(4), 629-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00073

Dietzenbacher, E., 2001. An Intercountry Decomposition of Output Growth in EC Countries. In M. L. Lahr and E. Dietzenbacher (Eds.), Input-Output Analysis: Frontiers and Extensions (pp. 121-142). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dietzenbacher, E., 2002. Interregional Multipliers: Looking Backward, Looking Forward. Regional Studies, 36(2), 125-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400220121918

Dietzenbacher, E., 2005. More on Multipliers. Journal of Regional Science, 45(2), 421-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00377.x

Dietzenbacher, E., Lenzen, M., Los, B., Guan, D., Lahr, L. M., Sancho, F., . . . Yang, C., 2013. Input-Output Analysis: The Next 25 Years. Economic Systems Research, 25(4), 369-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2013.846902

Dietzenbacher, E., and Van Der Linden, A. J., 1997. Sectoral and Spatial Linkages in the EC Production Structure. Journal of Regional Science, 37(2), 235-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00053

Dorfman, R., 1995. In Appreciation of Wassily Leontief. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6(3), 305-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0954-349X(95)00019-J

Duchin, F., 1995. In Honor of Wassily Leontief's 90th birthday. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6(3), 267-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0954-349X(95)00015-F

Eiser, D., and Roberts, D., 2002. The Employment and Output Effect of Changing Patterns of Afforestation in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(1), 65-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2002.tb00006.x

Freytag, A., and Fricke, S., 2017. Sectoral Linkages of Financial Services as Channels of Economic Development - An Input-Output Analysis of the Nigerian and Kenyan Economies. Review of Development Finance, 7(1), 36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2017.01.004

Ghosh, A., 1958. Input-Output Approach in an Allocation System. Economica, 25(97), 58-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2550694

Gigerenzer, G., and Gaissmaier, W., 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 451-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346

Godley, W., and Lavoie, M., 2007. Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230626546

Gruver, W. G., 1989. On the Plausibility of Supply-Driven Input-Output Model: A Theoretical Basis for Input Coefficient Change. Journal of Regional Science, 29(3), 441-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1989.tb01389.x

Guerra, A. I., and Sancho, F., 2010. A Comparison of Input-Output Models: Ghosh Reduces to Leontief. Barcelona Economic Working Paper Series(450).

Guerra, A. I., and Sancho, F., 2012. Budget-Constrained Expenditure Multipliers. Applied Economics Letters, 18(13), 1259-1262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2010.532101

Hazari, B. R., 1970. Empirical Identification of Key Sectors in the Indian Economy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(3), 301-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1926298

Heimler, A., 1991. Linkages and Vertical Integration in the Chinese Economy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(2), 261-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2109516

Hirschman, O. A., 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Humavindu, N. M., and Stage, J., 2013. Key Sectors of the Namibian Economy. Journal of Economic Structures, 2(1), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-2409-2-1

Ivanova, G., 2014. The Mining Industry in Queensland, Australia: Some Regional Development Issues. Resources Policy, 39(March), 101-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.01.005

Jackson, W. R., Rogerson, P., Plane, D., and Huallachain, O., 1990. A Causative Matrix Approach to Interpreting Structural Change. Economic Systems Research, 2(3), 259-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09535319000000018

Jensen, C. R., Mandeville, D. T., and Karunaratne, D. N., 1979. Regional Economic Planning: Generation of Regional Input-Output Analysis. London: Croom Helm Ltd.

Jones, P. L., 1976. The Measurement of Hirschmanian Linkages. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(2), 323-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884635

Kelly, S., 2015. Estimating Economic Loss from Cascading Infrastructure Failure: A Perspective on Modelling Interdependency. Infrastructure Complexity, 2(1), 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40551-015-0010-y

Kelly, S., Tyler, P., and Crawford-Brown, D., 2016. Exploring Vulnerability and Interdependency of UK Infrastructure Using Key-Linkages Analysis. Networks and Spatial Economics, 16(3), 865-892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9302-x

Kolokontes, D. A., Karafyllis, C., and Chatzitheodoridis, F., 2008. Peculiarities and Usefulness of Multipliers, Elasticities and Location Quotients for the Regional Development Planning: Another View. Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 2(2), 118-133.

Kolokontes, D. A., Kontogeorgos, A., Loizou, E., and Chatzitheodoridis, F., 2018. Key-Sectors Attractiveness of the Greek Economy: An Input-Output Approach. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 18, 35-54. http://www.usc.es/economet/aeid.htm#vol%2018-1.

Leontief, W. W., 1936. Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1927837

Leontief, W. W., 1951. Input-Output Economics. Scientific American, 185(4): DOI.

Lian, C., and Haimes, Y. Y., 2006. Managing the Risk of Terrorism to Interdepended Infrastructure Systems Through the Dynamic Inoperability Input-Output Model. Systems Engineering, 9(3), 241-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sys.20051

Loizou, E., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Michailidis, A., Tsakiri, M., and Theodossiou, G., 2015. Linkages of the Energy Sector in Greek Economy: An Input-Output Approach. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 9(3), 393-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-06-2013-0004

Long, N. B., 1970. An Input-Output Comparison of the Economic Structure of the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(4), 434-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1926321

Lopes, C. T., and Neder, D. H., 2017. Sraffa, Leontief, Lange: The Political Economy of Input-Output Economics. Economia, 18(2), 192-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2016.08.001

Mattas, A. K., and Shrestha, M. C., 1991. A New Approach to Determining Sectoral Priorities in an Economy: Input-Output Elasticities. Applied Economics, 23(1), 247-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036849108841069

Meng, B., Fang, Y., Guo, J., and Zhang, Y., 2017. Measuring China's Domestic Production Networks Through Trade in Value-Added Perspectives. Economic Systems Research, 29(1), 48-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2017.1282435

Meng, B., and Qu, C., 2008. Application on the Input-Output Decomposition Technique to China's Regional Economies. Journal of Applied Regional Science, 13, 27-46.

Milana, C., 1985. Direct and Indirect Requirements for Gross Output in Input-Output Analysis. Metroeconomica, 37(3), 283-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111

j.1467-999X.1985.tb00416.x

Miller, E. R., and Blair, D. P., 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Miller, E. R., and Blair, D. P., 2009. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626982

Müller-Hansen, F., Schlüter, M., Mäs, M., Donges, J. F., Kolb, J. J., Thonicke, K., and Heitzig, J., 2017. Towards representing human behavior and decision making in Earth system models – an overview of techniques and approaches. Earth Syst. Dynam., 8(4), 977-1007. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-977-2017

Oosterhaven, J., 1988. On the Plausibility of the Supply-Driven Input-Output Model. Journal of Regional Science, 28(2), 203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1988.tb01208.x

Oosterhaven, J., 1989. The Supply-Driven Input-Output Model: A New Interpretation but Still Implausible. Journal of Regional Science, 29(3), 459-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1989.tb01391.x

Oosterhaven, J., 1996. Leontief's Versus Ghosian Price and Quantity Models. Southern Economic Journal, 62(3), 750-759. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1060892

Oosterhaven, J., 2004. On the Definition of Key Sectors and the Stability of Net versus Gross Multipliers. SOM Research Report, No.04C01. Groningen: University of Groningen, SOM research school.

Oosterhaven, J., 2007. The Net Multiplier is a New Key Sector Indicator: Reply to De Mesnard's Comment. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(2), 273-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0094-2

Oosterhaven, J., 2017. Key Sector Analysis: A Note on the Other Side of the Coin. SOM Research Report no. 17015-GEM. University of Groningen, SOM research school. Groningen.

Oosterhaven, J., Eding, J. G., and Stelder, D., 2001. Clusters, Linkages and International Spillovers: Methodology and Policy Implications for the Two Dutch Mainports and the Rural North. Regional Studies, 35(9), 809-822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400120090239

Oosterhaven, J., and Stelder, D., 2002. Net Multipliers Avoid Exaggerating Impacts: With a Bi-regional Illustration for the Dutch Transportation Sector. Journal of Regional Science, 42(3), 533-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00270

Perroux, F., 1955. Note Sur la Notion de Pole de Croissance. Economia Aplicada, 1-2, 307-322.

Phillips, A., 1955. The Tableau Economique as a Simple Leontief Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 137-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884854

Plane, D. A., and Rogerson, P. A., 1986. Dynamic flow modeling with interregional dependency effects: An application to structural change in the U.S. migration system. Demography, 23(1), 91-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2061411

Puttanapong, N., 2016. Tracing Thailand's Linkages to Global Supply Chain: Applications of World Input-Output Database (WIOD) and Structural Path Analysis. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 14(1), 411-438.

Rasmussen, P. N., 1956. Studies in Intersectoral Relations. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.

Rey, J. S., 2000. Integrated Regional Econometric+Input-Output Modeling: Issues and Opportunities. Papers in Regional Science, 79(3), 271-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.2000.tb00772.x

Rickman, S. D., 2002. A Bayasian Forecasting Approach to Constructing Regional Input-Output Based Employment Multipliers. Papers in Regional Science, 81(4), 483-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.2002.tb01245.x

Rogerson, A. P., and Plane, A. D., 1984. Modeling Temporal Change in Flow Matrices. Papers in Regional Science, 54(1), 147-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1984.tb00821.x

Romero, I., Dietzenbacher, E., and Hewings, D. J. G., 2009. Fragmentation and Complexity: Analyzing Structural Change in the Chicago Regional Economy. Revista de Economia Mundial, 23, 263-282.

Sancho, F., 2012. Straightening Out the Concept of Direct and Indirect Input Requirements. Economic Bulletin, 32(1), 502-509.

Sancho, F., 2013. Some Conceptual Difficulties Regarding "Net" Multipliers. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(2), 537-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0542-0

Schultz, S., 1977. Approaches to Identifying Key Sectors Empirically by Means of Input-Output Analysis. The Journal of Development Studies, 14(1), 77-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220387708421663

Sonis, M., Guilhoto, M. J. J., Hewings, D. J. G., and Martins, B. E., 1995. Linkages, Key Sectors and Structural Change: Some New Perspectives. The Developing Economies, 33(3), 233-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1995.tb00716.x

Strassert, G., 1968. Zur Bestimmung Strategischer Sectorn Mit Hilfe von Input-Output Modellen. Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik, 182(1), 211-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-1968-0114

Szyrmer, J. M., 1992. Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers from a Total Flow Perspective. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 24(7), 921-937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a240921

Tadayuki, H., 2008. Quantitative Tourism Industry Analysis: Introduction to Input-Output, Social Accounting Matrix Modeling and Tourism Satellite Accounts. Canada: Charon Tec Ltd., A Macmillan Company, Elsevier Inc.

Temurshoev, U., 2010. Identifying Optimal Sector Groupings with the Hypothetical Extraction Method. Journal of Regional Science, 50(4), 872-890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00678.x

Temurshoev, U., and Oosterhaven, J., 2014. Analytical and Empirical Comparison of Policy-Relevant Key Sector Measures. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(3), 284-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2014.930168

Valadkhani, A., 2003. Using Input-Output Analysis to Identify Austalia's High Employment Generating Industries. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 29(3), 199-217.

Walras, L., 1874. Elements D’Economie Politique (ou Thoerie de la Richesse Sociale). Paris: Guillaumin and Cie Editeurs; Bale: H. Georg Libraire-Editeur.

Weber, M., 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. California: University of California Press.

West, R. G., and Jensen, C. R., 1980. Some Reflections on Input-Output Multipliers. The Annals of Regional Science, 14(2), 77-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01284205

Yotopoulos, A. P., and Nugent, B. J., 1973. A Balanced - Growth Version of the Linkage Hypothesis: A Test. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(2), 157-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1882181

Zhang, S. Z., 2001. Iterative Method for Finding the Balanced Growth Solution of the Non-Linear Dynamic Input-Output Model and the Dynamic CGE Model. Economic Modelling, 18(1), 117-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-9993(00)00031-6




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2019-0026

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
10.47743/saeb-2021-0009