Rethinking Microfinance in a Dual Financial System: An Agent-based Simulation

Sara Bourhime, Mohamed Tkiouat

Abstract


Critics concerning the real impact of traditional microfinance as a tool for poverty alleviation are becoming frequent. In contrast, the financial crisis brought out interest for Islamic finance, whose models have been increasingly studied. Today, the real challenge lies in evaluating the impact of microfinance in a complex environment, where both Islamic and conventional microfinance institutions exist and address evolving clients in constant interaction. New methods and models are therefore needed in order to test the efficacy and assess the impact of introducing Islamic microfinance products, compared to the conventional system. In this context, this paper proposes an approach to build an Agent-Based Modeling (ABM) framework, which is aiming to test the effects of such products implementation using Islamic interest-free group loans. It also helps assess the impact of the behavioral biases as well as agents’ interactions within the repayment process.

 


Keywords


Agent-based simulation; Dual-financial System; Islamic microfinance; Interest-free lending.

JEL Codes


C63; G21.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Accion International, 2009. Center for Financial Inclusion, Financial Inclusion Glossary. from http://www.centerforfinancialinclusion.org/Page.aspx?Pid=1941

Ahmed, H., 2002. Financing microenterprises: An analytical study of Islamic microfinance institutions. Islamic Economic Studies, 9(2), 27-64.

Al-Omar, F., and Abdel-Haq, M., 1996. Islamic banking: theory, practice, and challenges: Zed Books.

Armendariz de Aghion, B., and Morduch, J., 2000. Microfinance beyond group lending. Economics of Transition, 8(2), 401-420. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00049

Arthur, W. B., 2006. Out-of-equilibrium economics and agent-based modeling. Handbook of computational economics, 2, 1551-1564.

Ashraf, A. L. I., Hassan, M. K., and Hunt-Ahmed, K., 2013. An Integrated Islamic Poverty Alleviation Model Contemporary Islamic Finance (pp. 223-243): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118653814.ch14

Barnaud, C., Bousquet, F., and Trebuil, G., 2008. Multi-agent simulations to explore rules for rural credit in a highland farming community of Northern Thailand. Ecological Economics, 66(4), 615-627. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.022

Bourhime, S., and Tkiouat, M., 2016. Microfinance Overview: From simple loans to complex systems. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(1), 87-94.

Constantinou, D., and Ashta, A., 2011. Financial crisis: Lessons from microfinance. Strategic Change, 20(5-6), 187-203. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsc.895

De Marchi, S., and Page, S. E., 2014. Agent-based models. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 1-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-080812-191558

El-Zoghbi, M., and Tarazi, M., 2013. Trends in Sharia-Compliant Financial Inclusion. Brief. Washington, DC: CGAP.

Epstein, J. M., 2006. Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling: Princeton University Press.

Etzensperger, C., 2012. Microfinance Market Outlook 2015. www.responsability.com/domains/responsability_ch/data/free_docs/rA_Microfinance_Market-Outlook_2013_EN.pdf.

Ferber, J., 1999. Multi-agent systems: an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Frankiewicz, C., and Churchill, C., 2011. Making microfinance work. Geneva: International Labour Office.

Gait, A., and Worthington, A. C., 2007. A Primer on Islamic Finance: Definitions, Sources, Principles and Methods. University of Wollongong, School of Accounting and Finance Working Paper Series, 07/05.

Gangopadhyay, S., Ghatak, M., and Lensink, R., 2005. Joint liability lending and the peer selection effect. Economic Journal (London), 115(506), 1005-1015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01029.x

Giné, X., and Karlan, D. S., 2009. Group versus Individual Liability: Long Term Evidence from Philippine Microcredit Lending Groups. Working Papers no. 970. Economic Growth Center. Yale University.

Gonzalez, A., 2008. Microfinance, incentives to repay, and overindebtedness: Evidence from a household survey in Bolivia. (Doctoral dissertation), Ohio State University.

Haut-Commissariat au Plan, 2011. Indicateurs Sociaux du Maroc. Moroccan Social indicators, 2011. http://www.hcp.ma/file/141724/.

Hermes, N., and Lensink, R., 2011. Microfinance: Its impact, outreach, and sustainability. World Development, 39(6), 875-881. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.021

Janssen, M., and Ostrom, E., 2006. Empirically based, agent-based models. Ecology and Society, 11(2), art37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-01861-110237

Khawari, A., 2004. Microfinance: Does it hold its promises? A survey of recent literature. Discussion Paper 276. Hamburg Institute of International Economics. Hamburg.

Kravari, K., and Bassiliades, N., 2015. A survey of agent platforms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(1), 11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2661

Kustin, B., 2015. Islamic (Micro) Finance: Culture, Context, Promises, Challenges. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Loewenstein, G., 1999. Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. Economic Journal (London), 109(453), 25-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00400

McCauley, J. L., 2000. The futility of utility: How market dynamics marginalize Adam Smith. Physica A, 285(3), 506-538. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00296-X

Morvant-Roux, S., Guérin, I., Roesch, M., and Moisseron, J. Y., 2012. Explaining participation and repayment in microcredit schemes in rural Morocco: the role of social norms and actors. Working Paper 2012-2.

Naciri, N., and Tkiouat, M., 2015. Understanding complexity in economic systems with agent based modeling. Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, 4(3), 28-31.

Nicolis, G., and Nicolis, C., 2012. Foundations of complex systems: emergence, information and prediction: World Scientific. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/8260

Obaidullah, M., 2008. Introduction to Islamic microfinance. Mohammed

Obaidullah, Introduction to Islamic Microfinance: IBF Net Limited.

Obaidullah, M., and Khan, T., 2008. Islamic microfinance development: Challenges and initiatives. Islamic Res. Train. Inst., Policy Dialogue Paper No. 2,

Rashid, S., Yoon, Y., and Kashem, S. B., 2011. Assessing the potential impact of Microfinance with agent-based modeling. Economic Modelling, 28(4), 1907-1913.

Rashid, S., Yoon, Y., and Kashem, S. B., 2011. Assessing the potential impact of Microfinance with agent-based modeling. Economic Modelling, 28(4), 1907-1913.

Rosenberg, R., Gonzalez, A., and Narain, S., 2009. The new moneylenders: Are the poor being exploited by high microcredit interest rates? Moving Beyond Storytelling: Emerging Research in Microfinance (pp. 145-181). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3759(2009)0000092008

Saqalli, M., Gerard, B., Bielders, C. L., and Defourny, P., 2011. Targeting rural development interventions: Empirical agent-based modeling in Nigerien villages. Agricultural Systems, 104(4), 354-364. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.12.007

Schicks, J., 2014. Over-indebtedness in Microfinance-an empirical analysis of related factors on the borrower level. World Development, 54, 301-324. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.08.009

Smith, V. L., 1976. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. The American Economic Review, 66(2), 274-279.

Suarez, E. D., Castanon-Puga, M., and Marquez, B. Y., 2009. Analyzing the Mexican microfinance industry using multi-level multi-agent systems. Paper presented at the 2009 Spring Simulation Multiconference.

TechNavio, 2014. Global Islamic Microfinance Market 2014-2018.

Tesfatsion, L., 2006. Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. Handbook of computational economics, 2, 831-880.

Turrel, A., 2016. Agent-based models: understanding the economy from the bottom up. Quarterly bulletin Q4: Bank of England.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/saeb-2018-0002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
10.47743/saeb-2021-0009