Serres National Cadaster: An Intestate Succession Preliminary Case Study
Keywords:intestate succession, commons vs. anti-Commons theories, national cadastre, GLM, ANCOVA
In the famous “anti-Commons” theory, resources are underused when multiple owners are endowed with the right to exclude other potential users, in contrast to the “Commons” theory that identifies resource over-exploitation. In this crucial preliminary study, “Intestate Succession” (i.e. “Succession without Will”) is under investigation, thus evaluating whether the number of land cotenants (heirs, in “Intestate Succession”) affects significantly (or not) land market values, by taking into account certain significant economic variables, representing the whole population official and primary data, officially available from the municipal Serres Farmlands. Applying advanced GLM, we perform ANCOVA analysis, considering as dependent variable the market land value. We find that, controlling for the objective land value (IRS land value), location, irrigation, farmer identity, and land segmentation-fragmentation all affect significantly the market land value variable. Significantly, the number of heirs does not seem to be a significant factor yet in the context of the “anti-Commons” theory.JEL Codes - C13; O18; R11; Q15
American Association for Retired Persons Research Group, 2000. AARP survey. http://assets.aarp.org./rgcenter/econ/wiil.pdf.
Buchanan, J. M., and Yong, J. Y., 2000. Symmetric Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons. The Journal of Law & Economics, 43(1), 1-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467445
Coase, R. H., 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466560
Dagan, H., and Heller, M. A., 2001. The Liberal Commons. The Yale Law Journal, 110(4), 549-623. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/797596
Deaton, J. B., 2007. Intestate Succession and Heir Property: Implications for future research on the persistence of poverty in Central Appalachia. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(4), 927-942. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2007.11507081
Hardin, G., 1968. The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
Heller, M. A., 1998. The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets. Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621-688. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1342203
Heller, M. A., 1999. The Boundaries of Private Property. Yale Law Review, 108(6), 1163-1223. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/797326
Krugman, P., 1991. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483-499. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261763
Marsden, T., Banks, J., and Bristow, G., 2002. The Social Management of Rural Nature: Understanding Agrarian - based Rural Development. Environment & Planning, 34(5), 809-825. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a3427
Mitchell, T. W., 2001. From Reconstruction to Deconstruction: Undermining Black Landownership, Political Independence, and Community Partition Sales of Tenancies in Common. Northwestern University Law Review, 95(2), 505-580.
Pantazopoulos, N. I. (Ed.) 1974. Roman Law in Dialectical Relation to Greek Law (Vols. 1974i, 1979ii, 1979iii). Sakkoulas.
Shoemaker, J. A., 2003. Like Snow in the Spring Time: Allotment, Fractionation, and the Indian Land Tenure Problem. Wisconsin Law Review, ooo, 733-788.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 SCIENTIFIC ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All accepted papers are published on an Open Access basis.
The Open Access License is based on the Creative Commons license.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) under the following conditions:
1. they must attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor,
2. they may not use this contribution for commercial purposes,
3. they may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.